Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Research Notes and BioMed Central.

Open Access Short Report

Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight

Helen L Walls*, Anna Peeters, Haider Mannan and Christopher Stevenson

Author Affiliations

Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Victoria 3004, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Research Notes 2011, 4:145  doi:10.1186/1756-0500-4-145

Published: 23 May 2011

Abstract

Background

A number of studies have compared proportional increases over time in waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI). However this method is flawed. Here, we explain why comparisons of WC and BMI must take into account the relationship between them. We used data from two cross-sectional US surveys (NHANES 1988-94 and 2005-06), and calculated the percentage change in the average BMI and the average WC between the two surveys, comparing the results with a regression analysis of changes in WC relative to BMI.

Findings

The crude percentage change in BMI (5.8%) was marginally greater than for WC (5.1%). But these percentages cannot be directly compared, as the relationship between the measures is described by a regression equation with an intercept term that does not equal zero. The coefficient of time from the regression equation will determine whether or not WC is on average larger for a given BMI at the second compared with the first time point.

Conclusion

Differences in the percentage change in WC and the percentage change in BMI cannot be usefully directly compared. Comparisons of increases in the two measures must account for the relationship between them as described by the regression equation.