Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Research Notes and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Short Report

Analysing time course microarray data using Bioconductor: a case study using yeast2 Affymetrix arrays

Colin S Gillespie*, Guiyuan Lei, Richard J Boys, Amanda Greenall and Darren J Wilkinson

BMC Research Notes 2010, 3:81  doi:10.1186/1756-0500-3-81

PubMed Commons is an experimental system of commenting on PubMed abstracts, introduced in October 2013. Comments are displayed on the abstract page, but during the initial closed pilot, only registered users can read or post comments. Any researcher who is listed as an author of an article indexed by PubMed is entitled to participate in the pilot. If you would like to participate and need an invitation, please email, giving the PubMed ID of an article on which you are an author. For more information, see the PubMed Commons FAQ.

The limma model is not correct; see the updated paper at Colin's site for a correction.

David Airey   (2014-09-05 14:32)  NA

The design in the original paper repeatedly samples 6 flasks over 5 time points, rather than 30 flasks grown to different time points where each flask is sampled once. The latter design might be appropriately analyzed by the limma code presented in the paper, whereas a better comparison for the actual design with the "timecourse" package would be to consider hierarchical designs in limma. The design of the actual experiment is a simple split plot, with the one between subject (flask) factor being strain and the one within subject (flask) factor being time. The fix here is to note the correspondence between the example in section 9.7 of the limma manual. Substitute time for tissue, and flask for subject, and strain for condition and proceed as shown.

Competing interests



Post a comment