Table 4 |
||||||||||||
|
Comparison of the EF hands in zebrafish and human CaBPs and calneurons. |
||||||||||||
|
EF1 |
EF2 |
EF3 |
EF4 |
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Zebrafish |
Human |
Conserved |
Zebrafish |
Human |
Conserved |
Zebrafish |
Human |
Conserved |
Zebrafish |
Human |
Conserved |
|
|
CaBP1 |
D |
D |
75% |
D |
D |
92% (N) |
E |
E |
83% |
E |
E |
92% |
|
CaBP2 |
D |
E |
50% |
D |
D |
78% (N) |
E |
E |
67% |
E |
E |
100% |
|
CaBP4 |
D |
E |
42% |
D |
E |
58% (N) |
E |
E |
67% |
E |
E |
92% |
|
CaBP5 |
D |
D |
58% |
D |
D |
83% (N) |
E |
E |
58% |
E |
E |
92% |
|
Calneuron 1 |
E |
E |
100% |
E |
E |
100% |
E |
E |
100% (N) |
E |
E |
92% (N) |
|
Calneuron 2 |
E |
E |
100% |
E |
E |
100% |
E |
E |
100% (N) |
I |
D |
58% (N) |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
The table indicates whether the amino acid at position 12 of the EF-hand Ca2+-coordinating loop is an aspartic acid (D) or glutamate (E) and the percentage sequence identity between zebrafish and human EF-hand loop sequences. In the conserved column it is also indicated if the EF hand is predicted to be non-functional (N) and these are the same in the human and zebrafish proteins. |
||||||||||||
|
McCue et al. BMC Research Notes 2010 3:118 doi:10.1186/1756-0500-3-118 |
||||||||||||