Table 2 |
||
|
Fit results for NP parameters, semileptonic asymmetries and width differences. |
||
|
Observable |
68% Prob. |
95% Prob. |
|
|
||
|
|
-19.9 ± 5.6 |
[-30.45,-9.29] |
|
-68.2 ± 4.9 |
[-78.45,-58.2] |
|
|
|
1.07 ± 0.29 |
[0.62,1.93] |
|
|
||
|
|
-51 ± 11 |
[-69,-27] |
|
-79 ± 3 |
[-84,-71] |
|
|
|
0.73 ± 0.35 |
[0.24,1.38] |
|
1.87 ± 0.06 |
[1.50,2.47] |
|
|
|
||
|
Im |
-0.74 ± 0.26 |
[-1.54,-0.30] |
|
Re |
-0.13 ± 0.31 |
[-0.61,0.78] |
|
-1.82 ± 0.28 |
[-2.68,-1.36] |
|
|
|
||
|
|
-0.34 ± 0.21 |
[-0.75,0.03] |
|
|
-2.1 ± 1.0 |
[-4.7,-0.3] |
|
ΔΓs/Γs |
0.105 ± 0.049 |
[0.02,0.20] |
|
-0.098 ± 0.044 |
[-0.19,-0.02] |
|
|
|
||
|
Whenever present, we list the two solutions due to the ambiguity of the measurements. The first line corresponds to the one closer to the SM. |
||
|
Bona et al. PMC Physics A 2009 3:6 doi:10.1186/1754-0410-3-6 |
||