This article is part of the supplement: Genetic Analysis Workshop 17: Unraveling Human Exome Data
Performance of random forests and logic regression methods using mini-exome sequence data
- Equal contributors
1 Inherited Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
2 Clinical Sciences Section, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
3 Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 9):S104 doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S104Published: 29 November 2011
Machine learning approaches are an attractive option for analyzing large-scale data to detect genetic variants that contribute to variation of a quantitative trait, without requiring specific distributional assumptions. We evaluate two machine learning methods, random forests and logic regression, and compare them to standard simple univariate linear regression, using the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 mini-exome data. We also apply these methods after collapsing multiple rare variants within genes and within gene pathways. Linear regression and the random forest method performed better when rare variants were collapsed based on genes or gene pathways than when each variant was analyzed separately. Logic regression performed better when rare variants were collapsed based on genes rather than on pathways.