Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2011)

Open Access Poster presentation

The aerodynamic behaviour of respiratory aerosols

K Grosskopf

  • Correspondence: K Grosskopf

Author Affiliations

College of Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P90  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-P90


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S6/P90


Published:29 June 2011

© 2011 Grosskopf; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction / objectives

Hospital acquired infections (HAIs) claim on average 90,000 lives each year in the U.S., nearly three times the number of annual highway deaths. Although fewer than 15% of HAIs are directly attributable to airborne transmission, more than a third may be caused by surface microbes aerosolized by the movement of air from building systems, people and equipment. As a result, a study was devised to use a synthetic respiratory aerosol to track the movement airborne contagion with respect to various environmental conditions in a healthcare environment.

Methods

An actual hospital was used to map the spatial dispersion of synthetic respiratory aerosols with respect to particle size, airflow, door position and healthcare worker movement between a general patient room and corridor.

Results

Respirable aerosols 0.5µm to <1.0µm were found to exhibit distinctly different aerodynamic behaviours when compared to aerosols 1.0µm -10.0µm. Specifically, aerosols <1.0µm appeared to disperse randomly and uniformly throughout the test space with significantly less regard to mechanical airflow, pressure relationships, door position, and personnel movement when compared to aerosols 1.0µm -10.0µm.

Conclusion

Since expiratory droplets <1.0µm are believed to be both capable of carrying virus and penetrating into the alveolar region of the lung, these particles may present unique challenges for ventilation systems designed to protect the healthcare population from airborne viral transmission.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.