Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2011)

Open Access Poster presentation

Evaluation of Africa-Europe patient safety hospital partnerships: a framework

PD Rutter1, SB Syed2* and E Kelley2

  • * Corresponding author: SB Syed

Author Affiliations

1 WHO Patient Safety, London, UK

2 WHO Patient Safety, Geneva, Switzerland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P321  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-P321

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:29 June 2011

© 2011 Rutter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction / objectives

Evaluation is critical to continuous improvement. African Partnerships for Patient Safety (APPS) has 3 core objectives – partnership strength, patient safety improvement and patient safety spread – for which an evaluation framework was necessary. Action on health care-associated infections (HAI) provides a common platform of activity.


To mitigate expected challenges to evaluation implementation in African contexts, end-users contributed heavily to framework development, providing contextual awareness and building ownership. Indicators for each of the three objectives were identified, scrutinized and refined. Capture tools were sourced or developed. A three-step process was used: first, expert-led literature review; second, expert consensus; and third, consultative selection of key indicators with end users (African APPS hospitals). Available HAI tools were incorporated into the framework.


A three-pronged evaluation framework emerged. Six emergent domains of partnership strength (with associated facets for each domain) constituted the basis of evaluating this first core objective. A “3-2-1” approach emerged in evaluating hospital patient safety improvement focused on HAI (3 structure; 2 process; & 1 outcome indicator). An initial 20 measures of spread fell into two broad categories (initial spread activities & ongoing relationships). An evaluation handbook was developed to provide a single source of necessary tools for each of the three objectives.


We iteratively developed an evaluation framework for a broad-based patient safety programme in a resource-constrained setting. Simplicity was the focus throughout the process. Each of the three framework components can be used separately or in tandem in other settings and programs. Early APPS experiences in framework utilization can guide this.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.