Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2011)

Open Access Poster presentation

Recovery of MRSA and Clostridium difficile in an ICU ward

A Ram1*, AP Gibb2, K Templeton2, A Holmes3, D Swann2 and CM Taylor1

  • * Corresponding author: A Ram

Author Affiliations

1 Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK

2 Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

3 The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P185  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-P185


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S6/P185


Published:29 June 2011

© 2011 Ram et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction / objectives

The role of the hospital environment as a reservoir of infection is poorly understood. Therefore, baseline levels of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and Clostridium difficile contamination on surfaces were determined in an ICU ward. The aim was to determine whether contamination differs at certain times of the day, if recovery of pathogens is influenced by total background contamination and to what extent cleaning affects contamination levels.

Methods

Sampling occurred in an 18 bed ICU ward on regular days for one month. Surfaces were sampled from patient and non-patient areas, morning and afternoon, to detect total viable counts (TVC), MRSA and C. difficile using contact plates and swabs. Multi-locus variable number tandem repeat fingerprinting (MLVF) was performed on selected isolates to determine relationship of MRSA from patients and environment. Statistical analyses were carried out using non-parametric tests.

Results

Data showed MRSA was recovered from 32% and C. difficile recovered from 27% of surfaces. All surfaces tested were contaminated with no significant difference in TVC regardless of time of sampling. MLVF data suggested transfer of MRSA from patient to environment rather than the converse.

Conclusion

Cleaning was scheduled in the morning however, whether surfaces were re-contaminated after cleaning or whether cleaning was ineffective remains to be established and requires more investigation. Therefore bacteria were detected throughout the surveillance period providing data on baseline levels of MRSA and C. difficile on surfaces. Bacterial contamination remains at easily detectable levels despite regular cleaning so ward cleaning protocols may need to be revised.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.