Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2011)

Open Access Poster presentation

The challenges of hand hygiene improvement: a comparison between inpatient and outpatient units

JY Kawagoe1*, CV Silva1, MF Cardoso1, P Gonçalves1, MG Ballalai1, AR Toniolo1, CB DalForno1, ST Valerio2, EAA Reis3, LG Pontes1, LB Cunha2 and L Correa1

  • * Corresponding author: JY Kawagoe

Author Affiliations

1 Infection Prevention and Control Service, São Paulo, Brazil

2 Education and Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil

3 Patient Safety, Hospital Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P110  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-P110

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S6/P110


Published:29 June 2011

© 2011 Kawagoe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction / objectives

WHO Hand Hygiene (HH) Improvement Strategy Program has been implemented mostly in inpatient units. We implemented this strategy in inpatient and outpatient units.

Objective

Compare the results of HH adherence in inpatient and outpatient units.

Methods

This program was conducted in a 500-bed private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. WHO tool was used to assess HH adherence before (Jun-Aug2008) and after the intervention (Jul-Sept2009). The inpatient units were: Medical Surgical Ward, Oncology, Neonatal and Pediatrics and outpatient were: Surgical Ambulatory, Obstetric Center, Emergency, Post Anesthesia, Diagnostic Medicine Department and Dialysis Center. Several strategies were applied – campaigns, behavioral methods, and educational programs. More dispensers of alcohol-based product were made available in areas of the hospital such as restaurants, cafeterias, waiting rooms, lounges, receptions and next to elevators.

Results

In inpatient units the overall HH adherence improved 30.8%, from 63.8% (1433/2248 opportunities) to 83.5% (2144/2567 opportunities). In outpatient units it improved 53.2%, from 39.5 % (679/1721 opportunities) to 60.4% (1044/1728 opportunities). The only exception in HH improvement was physician (no increase in inpatient unit) and Obstetric Center (5% decrease).

Conclusion

The higher compliance was in inpatient units, although there was a significant improvement in outpatient units. We must develop and apply different strategies according to the needs of inpatient and outpatient units.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.