Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2011)

Open Access Oral presentation

150 years since “The etiology, concept, and prophylasix of childbed fever”

AJ Stewardson* and D Pittet

  • * Corresponding author: AJ Stewardson

Author Affiliations

Infection Control Program, University of Geneva Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):O61  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-O61


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S6/O61


Published:29 June 2011

© 2011 Stewardson and Pittet; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Oral presentation

2011 marks the sesquicentennial anniversary of the publication of “The etiology, concept, and prophylaxis of childbed fever”, the magnum opus of Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis' (1818–1865) determined, but not infrequently self-defeating, efforts to prove his theories regarding this disease. Now widely regarded as “the father of infection control”, his struggle to improve patient safety continues to provide an example – both good and bad – to those who seek to implement system change. He may or may not have been the first person to attribute an infectious aetiology to childbed fever, but he was certainly not the last person to make a few unwise decisions regarding the best means of influencing healthcare worker behaviour. His story remains relevant and this anniversary offers an opportunity to reflect on current challenges in patient safety; what would Ignaz make of the current landscape in patient safety and hand hygiene? Here we compare and contrast Semmelweis’ innovations with current approaches to implementation of quality improvement programs, and other patient safety topics such as patient participation and public reporting.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.