Table 2 |
|||
|
Comparison of population networks with HPRD network |
|||
|
Network |
No. of interactions |
Degree diameter |
Av. Path length |
|
|
|||
|
HPRD |
35706 |
7.79 |
4.22 |
|
CHI |
27877 |
7.71 |
5.42 |
|
GER |
25453 |
5.24 |
5.43 |
|
USA |
28453 |
5.598 |
5.34 |
|
SA |
24754 |
5.3 |
5.43 |
|
|
|||
|
HPRD had the highest number of interactions. This illustrates that all four population networks are sub-networks within HPRD |
|||
|
Pradhan et al. BMC Systems Biology 2012 6(Suppl 3):S17 doi:10.1186/1752-0509-6-S3-S17 |
|||
