Table 3

Comparison of growth performance of the in silico strain iJN746 and KT2442.

Strain

Carbon

source

μmax(h-1)

iJN746

μmax(h-1)

KT2442

Carbon Uptake rate

(mmol gDW/h)

O2 Uptake rate

(mmol gDW/h)


iJN746/KT2442

Glucose

0.751

0.56a

6.3a

15.34d

iJN746/KT2442

Toluene

0.421

0.72b

11.9b

18.5c

iJN746/KT2442

Toluene

0.476

0.72

11.9

20.93d

iJN746/KT2442

Toluene

0.7255

0.72

11.9

33

iJN746/KT2442

Toluene

1.262

0.72

11.9


Comparison of growth performance of the in silico strain iJN746 and KT2442. The in silico growth rate was calculated in iM9 minimal medium plus glucose or toluene. Due to candidate oxygen limited growth in toluene, the in silico growth rate was calculated under different oxygen uptake rates In addition iJN746 growth in toluene as only carbon source was simulated at different oxygen uptake rates. a from [25]; b from[26]; c from [78], and d experimentally determined in this study.

Nogales et al. BMC Systems Biology 2008 2:79   doi:10.1186/1752-0509-2-79

Open Data