Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Systems Biology and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: BioSysBio 2007: Systems Biology, Bioinformatics, Synthetic Biology

Open Access Poster presentation

Progression of oral carcinomas revealed by spectral reordering of a bipartite graph

Gabriela Kalna1*, Johanna Thurlow2, Keith Vass2 and Des Higham1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Mathematics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XH, Scotland, UK

2 The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow G61 1BD, Scotland, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Systems Biology 2007, 1(Suppl 1):P12  doi:10.1186/1752-0509-1-S1-P12

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1752-0509/1/S1/P12


Published:8 May 2007

© 2007 Kalna et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Introduction

Spectral, singular value decomposition-based, algorithms for dimension reduction and clustering are known to be useful in a range of areas of science and engineering. Motivation for this work is in the analysis of microarray data from a number of different samples leading to a natural bipartite graph framework. Spectral bi-partitioning of microarray data was for the first time considered in [1]. In this work we generalise the ideas in [2] in order to present further theoretical support and investigate a multiclass dataset with the aim of revealing a complex picture of oral cancer progression.

Materials and methods

A simple and informative derivation of a spectral algorithm for reordering a weighted bipartite graph is presented. We start with a discrete optimization problem then add constraints and relax it into a tractable continuous analogue. Natural data preprocessing is a part of the algorithm. Singular vectors can be used not only for gene/sample reordering but also for identifying informative genes. The data set pertains to the gene expression profile of different cell cultures (samples) isolated from normal oral tissue (N) and biopsies from different stages of oral cancer: dysplasias (D), primary (P), metastasised (M) and recurrencent cancers (R).

Results

Currently oral cancer is seen as a single progression mechanism. Here, the bi-partitioning algorithm applied to the gene expression matrix revealed a major distinction (V2 in Figure 1) between mortal and immortal (empty and full symbols) samples suggesting that oral cancer can develop by two pathways. Moreover, those dysplasias that are known to have progressed to cancer (green symbols) closely resemble cancer samples. This is of note since currently clinicians lack diagnostic tools to predict which dysplasias are likely to develop into cancer. The algorithm also identifies atypical cultures: a) the extended-lifespan D17EL dysplasia lacks expression of p16INK4A b) whereas the immortal dysplasia D38 continues to express p16INK4A, c) the immortal cancer P68 that clustered closest to the immortal dysplasias retains wild-type p53. More details can be found in [3].

thumbnailFigure 1. Oral cancer: spectral analysis

Conclusion

Immortality is a dominant factor influencing the overall gene expression profiles of both cancers and dysplasias and outcome data related to the different carcinoma cultures indicates that immortality is associated with poorer prognosis. Analysis of an additional data set shows gene expression changes consistently associated with immortality can be identified in vivo as well as in vitro.

References

  1. Kluger Y, Basri R, Chang JT, Gerstein M: Spectral biclustering of microarray data: coclustering genes and conditions.

    Genome Res 2003, 13:703-716. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Higham DJ, Kalna G, Kibble M: Spectral clustering and its use in bioinformatics.

    J Comput Appl Math

    online 2 June 2006.

    OpenURL

  3. Hunter KD, Thurlow JK, Fleming J, Drake PJH, Vass JK, Kalna G, Higham DJ, Herzyk P, MacDonald DG, Parkinson EK, Harrison PR: Divergent routes to oral cancer.

    Cancer Res 2006, 66:7405-7413. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL