Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Veterinary Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Mycobacterium bovis infections in slaughter pigs in Mubende district, Uganda: a public health concern

Adrian Muwonge1*, Tone B Johansen2, Edvardsen Vigdis2, Jacques Godfroid3, Francisco Olea-Popelka4, Demelash Biffa5, Eystein Skjerve1 and Berit Djønne2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, P.O. Box 8146, Dep., 0033, Oslo, Norway

2 Norwegian Veterinary Institute, P.O. Box 750, N-0106, Oslo, Norway

3 Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Section of Arctic Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Stakkevollveien 23, 9010, Tromsø, Norway

4 Department of Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Colorado State University Fort Collins, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1678, USA

5 College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1656 E. Mabel St, P.O. Box 245221, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Veterinary Research 2012, 8:168  doi:10.1186/1746-6148-8-168

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/8/168


Received:4 June 2012
Accepted:17 September 2012
Published:21 September 2012

© 2012 Muwonge et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Bovine tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium bovis is primarily a disease of ruminants, particularly cattle (Bos primigenius) and buffalo (Syncerus caffer), and is endemic in most developing countries. To date, studies done in Uganda have documented the prevalence of M. bovis in cattle, humans and wild life, in addition to non-tuberculous mycobacteria in pigs. Pigs are increasingly becoming an important component of the livestock sector and share the human ecosystem in rural Uganda. It is therefore of public health interest that they are not a source of human infections. As a follow up to previously published findings on mycobacteria in pigs, this study was aimed at investigating the occurrence and molecular characteristics of M. bovis detected in slaughter pigs in Mubende district, Uganda. One hundred fifty mesenteric lymph nodes with lesions suggestive of mycobacterial infections were collected from approximately one thousand slaughtered pigs in Mubende district over a period of five months. The isolation and identification of M. bovis was done using conventional mycobacteriological methods. Mycobacteria belonging to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) were identified to species level using deletion analysis. Molecular typing was done using Spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR analysis. Molecular data were analysed and interpreted using MIRU-VNTR plus, SpolDB4.0 and the Mycobacterium bovis spoligo database.

Results

Of the examined animals, one boar and two sows from Madudu Sub County were infected with M. bovis which presented as lesions of a deep yellow colour and a grit-like texture in the mesenteric lymph nodes. This represents 2% (3/150) of the lymph nodes where lesions suggestive of mycobacterial infections were detected. Molecular analysis revealed that the isolates from the infected pigs showed identical MIRU-VNTR profile and spoligotype (SB1469).

Conclusions

This is the first study documenting the occurrence of M. bovis in slaughter pigs in Uganda, revealing that one in fifty slaughter pigs with suspected lesions in mesenteric lymph nodes were infected. Molecular analysis revealed that the isolates were identical, showing a spoligotype previously reported from humans and cattle in the north eastern part of the Uganda cattle corridor. This finding is of public health importance, therefore there is a need for close cooperation between medical and veterinary professionals in designing and implementing control and prevention measures that safeguard the public from this potential source of zoonotic TB in Uganda.

Keywords:
Pigs; Spoligotype; MIRU-VNTR; M. bovis; Uganda

Background

Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) is the etiological agent of bovine tuberculosis (TB). Bovine TB is a recrudescent zoonosis whose eradication has eluded some of the least and most developed countries in the world. In most developing countries, bovine TB is endemic and there is little information available regarding the relationship between M. bovis infection in livestock, wildlife and the disease in humans [1,2]. The World Health Organization recently classified human TB caused by M. bovis as a “neglected zoonosis” [2]. Moreover, areas where bovine TB is endemic overlap with countries afflicted by high HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis co-infection rates. The added exposure to bovine TB presents a significant risk for developing M. bovis infection among humans [3]. There are some studies providing insight into the significance of M. bovis infection in humans in developing countries, however, the true extent of this problem remains largely unknown [2,3].

Humans can be infected by M. bovis orally, via inhalation of aerosolized particles containing M. bovis from infected animals [3] or through person to person transmission [4]. However, the most common route of infection with M. bovis is through the oral route by consumption of contaminated dairy products or undercooked animal products (i.e. from bovines and goats) [3,5,6]. M. bovis has the ability to survive for long periods in soil and slurry [7], a phenomenon which has recently been reaffirmed by a quantification assay that detected M. bovis in environmental samples [8]. This can represent yet another source of M. bovis for humans and animals, especially in bovine TB endemic areas.

Porcine TB caused by M. bovis has been reported in Argentina, South Africa and West Africa [1,9-11]. In South Africa, M. bovis accounted for 2.5% of isolated mycobacteria from pigs with pathological lesions [10]. Pigs can become infected from cattle by the oral route [1], and outbreaks have been associated with infected yards or buildings contaminated with infected faecal material, feeding piglets with infected cattle milk and contact with wild life [9-12]. Unlike in the past where pigs were considered an epidemiological dead end in transmission of bovine TB, reports in Spain and Portugal show a multi-directional cross contamination between domestic pigs and wild boars [13,14].

Pigs are increasingly becoming an important component of the livestock sector and human ecosystems in Uganda [15], therefore it is of public health interest to know if they are infected by zoonotic agents such as M. bovis[9,10]. Infected pigs are reported to present with progressive lesions of defined tubercles in the lungs, spleen and lymph nodes in the thoracic and/or abdominal cavity usually visible at inspection [10]. Routine abattoir meat inspections is the only economically feasible food safety tool that can be used in resource limited settings [10], however routine inspection is reported to have a low sensitivity for detecting tuberculosis lesions [16,17]. A recent study on slaughter pigs in Uganda also revealed that up to 31% of slaughtered pigs without visible lesions were harbouring non-tuberculous mycobacteria [18]. The sensitivity of routine inspection is reported to be affected by the frequency, dispersion and size of the lesions in addition to abattoir-environment factors like lighting and speed of flow system [19]. A combination of human factors like knowledge, experience, motivation, diligence, autonomy, and workload of the individuals conducting the examination can also significantly affect the outcomes of a routine meat inspection [19].

Molecular epidemiological tools have been used to characterise isolates of M. bovis, in order to decipher the dynamics or distribution and spread of bovine TB in different hosts. In that regard, spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR are highly recommended tools for molecular epidemiological investigations and transmission chain tracing [1,20,21]. In Uganda, close contact exists between humans, pigs, cattle, wildlife and the environment. Earlier studies have characterised isolates of M. bovis from cattle and humans in the cattle corridor, revealing identical spoligotypes [22,23]. There are reports documenting the prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria from slaughtered pigs in the Mubende district [18,24], but the role of pigs in the epidemiology of M. bovis had not been explored. This study was thus aimed at contributing to the knowledge of the epidemiology of M. bovis infections in Uganda, by investigating the occurrence and molecular characteristics of M. bovis from slaughter pigs, and by comparing these isolates with M. bovis detected from humans and cattle in earlier studies.

Material and method

Study site

Mubende is located in the central region (000 33' 27''N, 310 23' 42''E) of Uganda. It is divided into two counties namely; Buwekula and Kassanda which are further divided into 10 Sub Ccounties; Bagezza (urbanized sub county), Butologo, Kasambya, Kitenga, Kiyuni, Madudu, Bukuya, Kassanda, Kiganda and Myanzi (Figure 1). Mubende is inhabited by approximately 750,000 people, 60% of whom live below the poverty line in population dense urban and peri-urban areas, where the prevalence of HIV is reported to be as high as 18% [25,26]. The district lies in the typical pastoral Uganda cattle corridor, and is endowed with livestock like cattle (35,000), goats (12,000), sheep (6,000), pigs (80,000) and chicken (360,000) [25,26]. Madudu and Kiyuni sub counties are home to the largest proportion of the pig population in the district majority of which are reared on free range [26,27]. Mubende district is also blessed with wild life especially wild swine at the south eastern corner of the district in proximity with Lake Wamala [28].

thumbnailFigure 1. Map of the Uganda cattle corridor showing Mubende district and sub counties, illustrating where Mycobacterium bovis spoligotype SB1469 has previously been recovered from humans and slaughtered cattle [[23]] and slaughtered pigs (present study).

Study animals

The present study was carried out between February and June 2011 as a follow up to a previous study conducted by Muwonge et al. [24]. The earlier study documented the prevalence of non- tuberculous mycobacteria in slaughtered pigs based on the detection of acid fast bacteria and molecular identification of mycobacteria from cervical lymph nodes in the same area [18,24].

In the present study, an approximate total of 1000 pig carcasses slaughtered at the age of one year or older were inspected at thirty one slaughter houses which were randomly selected, as described in [21]. They slaughtered about 200 animals each month [29], and were randomly visited for a convenient sampling of mesenteric lymph nodes with gross pathological lesions during a period of five months. The average number of pigs slaughtered varied at slaughter house level, with the majority of slaughter houses in Madudu, Kiyuni, Bagezza and Mubende town council slaughtering 5–8 pigs while the rest slaughtered 3–5 pigs per day.

Sampling and isolation of Mycobacteria

Mesenteric lymph nodes that showed the following gross pathological picture were collected; increased size, colour changes, high vascularisation, granulation and/or caseous texture. One hundred and fifty mesenteric lymph nodes were collected and shipped to the BSL3 laboratory at the Norwegian Veterinary institute in Oslo for analysis. Data on Sub County, rearing method and sex of the animal were recorded for each sample (Table 1).

Table 1. The distribution of Mycobacterium bovis recovered from lymph nodes with lesions in slaughtered pigs in Mubende district

Approximately 3 grams of the lymph nodes was ground with sterile sand and decontaminated with oxalic acid as described in Muwonge et al. [24]. Finally, 2–3 drops were transferred to both Stonebrink with pyruvate and Middelbrook media and incubated for 8 weeks at 37°C. The media were monitored weekly for growth. Acid fast bacteria, as demonstrated by Ziehl-Neelsen staining, were identified as Mycobacterium spp, and further identified.

Mycobacterial DNA extraction and molecular analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted by heat inactivation of culture material dissolved in TE buffer and the supernatant was used directly as template. Sequencing of the 16S rDNA gene was performed as described by Muwonge et al. [18].

Identification of isolates belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex (MTC) was performed by genomic region of difference analysis as previously described [29] at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute. A set of primers including RD1, RD4, RD9 and RD12 were used [30]. Spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR were performed by Genoscreen©. For spoligotyping; amplification of the spacers was done using the primers DRa and DRb, which enable amplification of the whole DR region [31]. For MIRU-VNTR, the standardized protocol using 15 loci as described by Supply et al. 2006 were used [32]. The results were reported in Roman numerals representing the number of repeats per loci. M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv were used as positive controls and water as a negative control for both methods.

Data analysis

Molecular results from Genoscreen© in France and the Norwegian Veterinary Institute were entered and validated in Excel® 2007. These were then copied into MIRU-VNTR plus to compare with strains in the data base. The same data set was compared against the SpolDB4.0 and M. bovis spoligo data bases available at http://www.pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVITDemo/ webcite and http://www.mbovis.org/ webcite respectively.

Ethical considerations

Scientific and ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST). The research ethics committee found this study to be scientifically and ethically in accordance with the requirements and therefore was approved with reference number HS 879.

Results

Culture results

Isolates were verified as belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex based on typical growth on culture media, positive result on ZN staining and by 16S rDNA sequencing. Deletion analysis confirmed the isolates as M. bovis, based on presence of RD1 and absence of RD4, RD9 and RD12 [30].

M. bovis was detected from three (2%) of the 150 examined lymph nodes with lesions compatible with tuberculosis. The lymph nodes originated from three different pigs. The isolates were recovered from one boar and two sows in Madudu Sub County (Table 1). It is noteworthy that some rapid growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria where recovered from the sampled lymph (unpublished results).

Gross appearance of lymph nodes

The results show that two of the mesenteric lymph nodes, each recovered from a different pig, from which M. bovis was recovered, showed typical lesions of tuberculosis. These were characterized by caseocalcerous tubercle appearance with grit-like particles embedded within deep yellow remnants of the lymph node (Figure 2). The last lymph node appeared abnormal but not as distinctive.

thumbnailFigure 2. Gross pathological appearance of mesenteric lymph nodes from which Mycobacterium bovis was isolated.

Molecular characteristics of M. bovis isolates

All the three isolates were identical on both MIRU-VNTR analysis and spoligotyping (Table 2). Based on the latter, the isolates lacked hybridization at position 3–7, 9, 16, 18–22 and 39–43. This spoligo pattern was registered in the M. bovis spoligo database as SB1469.

Table 2. MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotype of Mycobacterium bovis isolated from mesenteric lymph nodes of slaughtered pigs in Mubende district, Uganda

Discussion

This study documents the occurrence of M. bovis in slaughtered pigs in Uganda for the first time. The findings are of public health concern in this predominantly pig rearing and pork consuming population with a known high HIV prevalence.

The results revealed that 2% of the mesenteric lymph nodes with lesions submitted for analysis were infected with M. bovis, which is approximately similar to the 2.5% prevalence detected in South Africa [10]. Typical macroscopic TB pathology, characterized by a deep yellow colouring of the lymph node with a grit-like texture on culture processing, was visible in two of the mesenteric lymph nodes. This pathological picture is in concordance with that reported by Cousin et al. [10]. The actual prevalence of M. bovis infections in pigs might be higher than detected in this study given that a convenient sampling was used which might have missed infected lymph nodes that had not yet developed lesions. Additionally, growth of non-tuberculous mycobacteria might have concealed the presence of M. bovis in some samples.

Epidemiologically, pigs are considered spill over hosts in M. bovis transmission [13,14] therefore in conventional epidemiological studies they would not be the focal host of investigation. Some studies have however shown that depending on the rearing system in use, pigs can be used as sentinels for other hosts [12]. Therefore, as there is no study published on the prevalence of M. bovis in domestic and wild animals in Mubende district, this could be an indicator of a higher prevalence among cattle and/or wild boars in the study area. The public health conundrum is that although routine abattoir meat inspection is the economically feasible food safety tool in resource limited settings, it is reported to have a low sensitivity for detecting tuberculosis lesions [16-18]. In Mubende district, this situation is likely to be compounded by unreliable routine meat inspection and veterinary extension services [27,29]. This could imply that a considerable proportion of the human population can be exposed to mycobacteria of porcine origin if and when undercooked pork is consumed.

Reports in Africa have indicated that pigs are infected with M. bovis through direct contact with infected cattle or by feeding piglets with infected milk from cattle [5,9]. In southern Europe, domestic pigs are reported to be infected by wildlife reservoir hosts like the wild boar [13,14]. In Mubende, both sources of infection are plausible, given that the district lies in the Uganda cattle corridor where M. bovis prevalence has been documented [22,23] and the presence of bush pigs and warthogs at the south western corner of the district [28]. All the M. bovis isolates were recovered from Madudu Sub County. This apparent geographic predilection could be due to the high pig population in Madudu which inherently formed the biggest proportion of the sample.

Molecular analysis revealed that all the three isolates were identical on spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR analysis and although we could not establish if these pigs were from the same farm, their identical genotype suggests a common source of infection. The spoligo patterns were identified as SB1469, previously reported from cattle and humans in Karamoja in the north eastern part of the Uganda cattle corridor [22,23]. Both Karamoja and Mubende lay in the Uganda cattle corridor, which is characterized by a high cattle population and high mobility of people and livestock. This seem to indicate that the presently described spoligotype could be widely prevalent in the Uganda cattle corridor, although SB1469 was not among the spoligotypes reported in Kampala [33] where most of the slaughtered cattle originate from the south-western part of the Uganda cattle corridor.

Conclusions

This is the first study documenting the occurrence of M. bovis in slaughter pigs in Uganda, revealing that one in fifty slaughter pigs with suspected lesions in mesenteric lymph nodes were infected. Molecular analysis revealed that the isolates were identical, showing a spoligotype previously reported from humans and cattle in the north eastern part of the Uganda cattle corridor. This finding is of public health importance, therefore there is a need for close cooperation between medical and veterinary professionals in designing and implementing control and prevention measures that safeguard the public from this potential source of zoonotic TB in Uganda.

Competing interests

This was purely research work and therefore to the best of our knowledge there was no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

AM: contributed to the conception, design, and data collection, laboratory work, drafting and writing of the manuscript. TBJ: contributed to laboratory work, data analysis and drafting of the manuscript. VE, DB, FOP: contributed to the laboratory analysis and drafting of the manuscript. JG, ES and BD: contributed to the acquisition of funds, design of study and drafting of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out by the generous financial supports obtained from the Norwegian Educational Loan fund as quota scholarship to Dr. Adrian Muwonge, as well as from core funding source of the Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science and the Norwegian Veterinary Institute. The authors are grateful to the participant who contributed to all of the studies and the teams of investigators involved. We also would like to thank Kenneth Okanga for the work in Uganda, Dr. Lunze George, Dr. Asimwe Alani, Dr. Gerald Mwanje, Dr David Walabyeki, Mr. Willy Yawe and all the Mubende district and sub-county officials for making it easy for us to collect samples.

References

  1. Barandiaran S, Martínez M, Vivot M, Moras EV, Cataldi AA, Zumárraga MJ: Mycobacterium bovis in swine: spoligotyping of isolates from Argentina.

    Vet Med Int 2011, 19:6. OpenURL

  2. Michel A, Müller B, van Helden P: Mycobacterium bovis at the animal–human interface: a problem, or not?

    Vet Microbiol 2010, 140:371-381. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Biet F, Boschiroli ML, Thorel MF, Guilloteau LA: Zoonotic aspects of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC).

    J Vet Res 2005, 36:411-436. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. LoBue PA, Betacourt W, Peter C, Moser KS: Epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis disease in San Diego County, 1994–2000.

    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003, 7(2):180-185. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Thoen CO, Lobue PA, Enarson DA, Kaneene JB, de Kantor IN: Tuberculosis: a re-emerging disease in animals and humans.

    Vet Ital 2009, 45(1):135-181. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Cressey P, Lake R, Hudson A: Risk profile: Mycobacterium bovis in red meat. New Zealand Food Safety Authority; 2006.

    http://foodsafety.govt.nz/elibrary/industry/Risk_Profile_Mycobacterium_Bovis-Science_Research.pdf webcite

    OpenURL

  7. Menzies FD, Neill SD: Cattle-to-cattle transmission of bovine tuberculosis.

    Vet J 2000, 160:92-106. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Pontiroli A, Travis ER, Sweeney FP, Porter D, Gaze WH, Mason S, Hibberd V, Holden J, Courtenay O, Willington EM: Pathogen quantitation in complex matrices: a multi-operator comparison of DNA extraction methods with a novel assessment of PCR inhibition.

    PLoS One 2011, 6(3):e17916. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  9. Awa DN, Njoya AC, Tama N, Ekue FN: Diseases in north Cameroon: the health status of pigs in north Cameroon. CIRAD Pig trop; 1999.

    http://pigtrop.cirad.fr/subjects/animal_health/diseases_in_north_cameroon webcite

    OpenURL

  10. Cousin DV, Huchezermeyer HFKA, Griffin JFT, Brückner GK, Van Rensburg Kriek NPJ: Tuberculosis in infectious diseases of livestock. In Infectious diseases of livestock. 3rd edition. Edited by Coetzer JAW, Tustin RC. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004:1973-1987. OpenURL

  11. Jenkins AO, Cadmus SI, Venter EH, Pourcel C, Hauk Y, Vergnaud G, Godfroid J: Molecular epidemiology of human and animal tuberculosis in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria.

    J Vet Microbiol 2011, 151(1–2):139-147. OpenURL

  12. Nugent G, Whitford J, Nigel Y: Use of released pigs as sentinels for Mycobacterium bovis.

    J Wildlife dis 2009, 38(4):665-677. OpenURL

  13. Parra A, Fernández-Llario P, Tato A, Larrasa J, García A, Alonso JM, Hermoso de Mendoza M, Hermoso de Mendoza J: Epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections of pigs and wild boars using a molecular approach.

    Vet Microbiol 2003, 97(1–2):123-133. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Santos N, Correia-Neves M, Ghebremichael S, Källenius G, Svenson SB, Almeida V: Epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wild boar (Sus scrofa) from Portugal.

    J. Wildlife Dis 2009, 45(4):1048-1061. OpenURL

  15. Government of Uganda: Bankable Investment Project Profile: Livestock Development Project. 2004 edition. NEPAD and FAO; 2004.

    Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/ae562e/ae562e00.pdf webcite .Accessed January 2011

    OpenURL

  16. Frankena K, White PW, O'Keeffe J, Costello E, Martin SW, van Grevenhof I, More SJ: Quantification of the relative efficiency of factory surveillance in the disclosure of tuberculosis lesions in attested Irish cattle.

    Vet Rec 2007, 161:679-684. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Olea-Popelka F, Freeman Z, White P, Costello E, O’Keeffe J, Frankena K, Martin W, More S: Relative effectiveness of Irish factories in the surveillance of slaughtered cattle for visible lesions of tuberculosis, 2005–2007.

    Irish Vet J 2012, 65:2. BioMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  18. Muwonge A, Kankya C, Johansen TB, Djønne B, Godfroid J, Biffa D, Edvardsen V, Skjerve E: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from slaughter pigs in Mubende district.

    Uganda. BMC Vet Res 2012, 8:52. OpenURL

  19. Corner LA: Post mortem diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle.

    Vet Microbiol 1994, 40(1–2):53-63. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  20. Supply P, Mazars E, Lesjean S, Vincent V, Gicquel B, Locht C: Variable human minisatellite-like regions in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome.

    Mol Microbiol 2000, 36(3):762-771. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Roring S, Scott A, Brittain D, Walker I, Hewinson G, Neill S, Skruce R: Development of variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium bovis: comparison of results with those obtained by using existing exact tandem repeats and spoligotyping.

    J Clin Microbiol 2002, 40(6):2126-2133. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  22. Oloya J, Kazwala R, Lund A, Opuda-Asibo J, Demelash AB, Skjerve E, Johansen TB, Djønne B: Characterization of mycobacteria isolated from slaughtered cattle in pastoral regions of Uganda.

    BMC Vet Res 2007, 7:95. OpenURL

  23. Oloya J, Opuda-Asibo J, Kazwala R, Demelash AB, Skjerve E, Lund A, Johansen TB, Djønne B: Mycobacteria causing human cervical lymphadenitis in pastoral communities in the Karamoja region of Uganda.

    Epidemiol Infect 2008, 136(5):636-643. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  24. Muwonge A, Kankya C, Godfroid J, Djonne B, Opuda-Asibo J, Biffa D, Skjerve E: Prevalence and associated risk factors of mycobacterial infections in slaughter pigs from Mubende district in Uganda.

    J. Trop An Health and Prod 2010, 42:905-913. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Kissaka A:

    Mubende Orphans Support Organization, Uganda. 2009.

    Available at http://mosouganda.orphanage.org webcite. Accessed December 2011

    OpenURL

  26. UBOS: Uganda demographic and Health survey 2000–2001. Uganda Bureau of statistics; 2002.

    retrieved from: http://www.ubos.org/onlinefiles/uploads/ubos/pdf%20documents/Uganda%20DHS%202000-01%20Final%20Report.pdf webcite accessed on 26.04.2012

    PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  27. NEMA:

    District state of Environment report Mubende disistrict.National environment authority 2004.

    Available at http://www.nemaug.org/district_reports/mubende_2004_report.pdf webcite. Accessed January 20. Kateregga D: Lake Wamala Uganda.Global Nature Fund 2010. Available at http://www.globalnature.org/29791/Living-Lakes/Network-EastAfrica/Wamala/02 vorlage.asp webcite. Accessed on 9/04/12

    OpenURL

  28. Kateregga D: Lake Wamala Uganda. Global Nature Fund; 2010.

    Available at http://www.globalnature.org/29791/Living-Lakes/Network-EastAfrica/Wamala/02 vorlage.asp webcite. Accessed on 9/04/12

    OpenURL

  29. Muwonge A, Munang'andu HM, Kankya C, Biffa D, Oura C, Skjerve E, Oloya J: African swine fever among slaughter pigs in Mubende district, Uganda.

    Trop Anim Health Prod 2012.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22367736 webcite

    OpenURL

  30. Warren RM, van Pittius NC G, Barnard M, Hesseling A, Engelke E, De Kock M: 'Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by PCR amplification of genomic regions of difference.

    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006, 10:818-822. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J: Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology.

    J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35(4):907-914. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  32. Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Cardoso-Oelemann M, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Willery E, Savine E, de Haas P, van Deutekom H, Roring S, Bifani P, Kurepina N, Kreiswirth B, Sola C, Rastogi N, Vatin V, Gutierrez MC, Fauville M, Niemann S, Skuce R, Kremer K, Locht C, van Soolingen D: Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

    J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44(12):4498-4510. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  33. Asiimwe BB, Asiimwe J, Ghebremichae S, Kallenius G, Ashaba , Joloba FK, Koivula T: Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from cattle carcases at a city slaughterhouse in Uganda.

    Vet Rec 2009, 164:655-658. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL