Table 1 |
|||||||
|
Number and distribution of ruminant mycoplasma species, identified by VIGIMYC between 2003 and 2008. |
|||||||
|
Ruminant hosts (total number of strains) |
Cattlea (1142) |
Goatsb (664) |
Sheepc (137) |
Ibexd (61) |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
Mycoplasma species recovered |
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
|
|
|||||||
|
M. bovis |
628 |
55 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. agalactiae |
1 |
0.1 |
13 |
2 |
28 |
20.4 |
11 |
|
M. bovirhinis (o) |
314 |
27.5 |
- |
- |
1 |
0.7 |
- |
|
M. canis (p ?) |
2 |
0.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. arginini (o ?) |
162 |
14.1 |
65 |
10 |
92 |
67.1 |
4 |
|
M. alkalescens (p ?) |
14 |
1.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. canadense (p ?) |
5 |
0.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. bovigenitalium (o) |
4 |
0.4 |
- |
- |
1 |
0.7 |
- |
|
M. mycoides subsp. capri |
4 |
0.4 |
281 |
42.3 |
6 |
4.4 |
43 |
|
M. mycoides subsp. mycoides SC |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. capricolum subsp. capricolum |
- |
- |
175 |
26.3 |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. leachii |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. putrefaciens |
- |
- |
104 |
15.5 |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. yeatsii (o) |
- |
- |
24 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
- |
|
M. ovipneumoniae (p ?) |
- |
- |
1 |
0.2 |
8 |
6 |
- |
|
M. auris (o) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
|
M. conjunctivae |
- |
- |
1 |
0.2 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Acholeplasma laidlawii (o) |
8 |
0.7 |
- |
- |
1 |
0.7 |
- |
|
|
|||||||
|
Species for which the pathogenicity is unknown (p?) or that are opportunists (o) or putative opportunists (o?) are indicated. N = number of strains identified for each species. % = percentage of strains belonging to a mycoplasmal species in relation to the total number of mycoplasmal strains isolated from each farm species. - = zero. a) Cattle: 1061 cultures were received from 857 outbreaks, of which 61 were negative (no mycoplasma or contamination by bacterial or fungi) b) Goats: 611 cultures were received from 268 outbreaks, of which 45 were negative. c) Sheep: 158 cultures were received from 113 outbreaks, of which 28 were negative. d) Ibex: 74 cultures were received from ibex, of which 13 were negative. |
|||||||
|
Chazel et al. BMC Veterinary Research 2010 6:32 doi:10.1186/1746-6148-6-32 |
|||||||