Table 2 |
||||
|
Segregation analysis – Parameter estimates, log-likelihood and AIC associated with the general autosomal mode of transmission and the general, dominant and recessive X-linked modes of transmission. |
||||
|
Autosomal |
X-linked |
|||
|
|
||||
|
General |
General |
Dominant |
Recessive |
|
|
|
||||
|
q2 |
0.39 |
0.39 |
0.54 |
0.46 |
|
f11 |
0.38 |
0.29 |
1 |
0 |
|
f12 |
0.31 |
0 |
0 |
= f11 |
|
f22 |
0.41 |
0.88 |
= f12 |
1 |
|
No. |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
-2 lnL |
102.6 |
82.4 |
87 |
87 |
|
AIC |
110.6 |
88.4 |
89 |
89 |
|
χ2(df) |
4.6(2) |
4.6(2) |
||
|
P |
0.10 |
0.10 |
||
|
|
||||
|
q2: frequency of the risk allele 2; f11, f12, f22: penetrances of genotypes 11, 12 and 22. No.: No. of independent parameters estimated = (no. of parameters in the model)-(no. of parameters that converged to a boundary); lnL: log-likelihood; AIC: Aikaike criterion (-2 lnL + 2 No). χ2 (df): chi-squared test comparing the general X-linked model with the restricted X-linked models. P: associated p-value. |
||||
|
Vilboux et al. BMC Veterinary Research 2008 4:10 doi:10.1186/1746-6148-4-10 |
||||