Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Vernon |
| 30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James F Jones |
| 24 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John LaManca |
| 14 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Vernon |
| 3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James F Jones |
| 24 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Donath |
| 20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Vernon |
| 4 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James F Jones |
| 9 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-91 |
You can find further information about peer review here.