Table 3 |
||||
|
Effect of simvastatin allocation on site-specific cancer incidence |
||||
|
Cancer site |
Simvastatin-allocated (10,269) |
Placebo-allocated (10,267) |
Event rate ratio (& 95% CI) |
P-value |
|
|
||||
|
Respiratory |
||||
|
Lung/larynx |
171 (1.7%) |
157 (1.5%) |
1.08 (0.87 – 1.34) |
|
|
Other |
8 (0.1%) |
10 (0.1%) |
0.79 (0.32 – 2.00) |
|
|
Subtotal: Respiratory |
179 (1.7%) |
167 (1.6%) |
1.06 (0.86 – 1.31) |
0.6 |
|
Gastrointestinal |
||||
|
Upper GI |
74 (0.7%) |
62 (0.6%) |
1.18 (0.84 – 1.65) |
|
|
Colon/rectum |
114 (1.1%) |
131 (1.3%) |
0.86 (0.67 – 1.11) |
|
|
Other |
41 (0.4%) |
33 (0.3%) |
1.23 (0.78 – 1.94) |
|
|
Subtotal: Gastrointestinal |
228 (2.2%) |
223 (2.2%) |
1.01 (0.84 – 1.22) |
0.9 |
|
Connective tissue |
||||
|
Female breast |
38 (1.5%) |
51 (2.0%) |
0.74 (0.49 – 1.12) |
|
|
Melanoma |
17 (0.2%) |
10 (0.1%) |
1.66 (0.78 – 3.54) |
|
|
Other |
5 (0.0%) |
7 (0.1%) |
0.71 (0.23 – 2.20) |
|
|
Subtotal: Connective tissue |
60 (0.6%) |
68 (0.7%) |
0.87 (0.62 – 1.24) |
0.4 |
|
Genitourinary |
||||
|
Renal |
23 (0.2%) |
22 (0.2%) |
1.04 (0.58 – 1.86) |
|
|
Bladder |
74 (0.7%) |
90 (0.9%) |
0.81 (0.60 – 1.11) |
|
|
Prostate |
145 (1.9%) |
145 (1.9%) |
0.99 (0.79 – 1.25) |
|
|
Gynaecological |
19 (0.7%) |
18 (0.7%) |
1.05 (0.55 – 2.00) |
|
|
Other |
6 (0.1%) |
6 (0.1%) |
0.99 (0.32 – 3.08) |
|
|
Subtotal: Genitourinary |
259 (2.5%) |
272 (2.6%) |
0.94 (0.80 – 1.12) |
0.5 |
|
Haematological |
||||
|
Leukaemia/lymphoma |
42 (0.4%) |
32 (0.3%) |
1.30 (0.82 – 2.05) |
|
|
Other |
23 (0.2%) |
23 (0.2%) |
0.99 (0.55 – 1.76) |
|
|
Subtotal: Haematological |
64 (0.6%) |
52 (0.5%) |
1.22 (0.85 – 1.75) |
0.3 |
|
Other & unspecified |
54 (0.5%) |
57 (0.6%) |
0.94 (0.65 – 1.36) |
0.7 |
|
ALL CANCERS* |
814 (7.9%) |
803 (7.8%) |
1.00 (0.91 – 1.11) |
0.9 |
|
|
||||
|
* Prespecified that analyses of cancer incidence were to exclude non-melanoma skin cancer (243 [2.4%] simvastatin-allocated versus 202 [2.0%] placebo-allocated; p = 0.06). |
||||
|
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group BMC Medicine 2005 3:6 doi:10.1186/1741-7015-3-6 |
||||