Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guy ROUSSEAU |
| 7 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ove Wiborg |
| 12 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucia Carboni |
| 4 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Berk |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Berk |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guy ROUSSEAU |
| 26 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ove Wiborg |
| 3 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucia Carboni |
| 3 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Berk |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 24 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucia Carboni |
| 27 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Berk |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 27 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 12 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Berk |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 12 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-32 |
You can find further information about peer review here.