|
Randomized trials of preoperative RT versus surgery alone in resectable rectal cancer. |
|||||||
| Trial (reference) |
No. of patients randomized RT / no RT (analyzed) |
RT prescription* |
Biologically effective dose (Gy10) |
Compliance with RT† 0 <1 >1 |
Surgical delay after RT (days) |
Median follow-up (months) |
Study quality score‡ |
|
|
|||||||
| Yale [16] |
15 (15) / 16 (16) |
45 in 25 (31) 2 fields, G |
53.1 |
- 7% - |
2–42 |
>60 |
0.29 |
| Toronto [17] |
60 (60) / 65 (65) |
5 in 1 (1) 2 fields, P |
7.5 |
- - - |
0 |
72 |
0.55 |
| MRC-I [18] |
549 (549) / 275 (275) |
5 in 1 (1) or 20 in10 (14) 2 fields, G |
7.5 or 19.8 |
2% 6% - |
<7 |
>60 |
0.66 |
| VASOG-II [19] |
180 (180) / 181 (181) |
31.5 in 18 (24) 2 fields, G |
26.8 |
7% 11% 4% |
~40 |
60 |
0.70 |
| Norway [20] |
159 (155) / 150 (145) |
31.5 in 18 (24) 2 fields, G |
26.8 |
1% - - |
<21 |
54 |
0.80 |
| EORTC [21] |
236 (231) / 230 (228) |
34.5 in 15 (19) 2 fields, G |
35.2 |
1% - - |
1–69 |
>72 |
0.67 |
| Brazil [22] |
34 (34) / 34 (34) |
40 in 20 (25) 2 fields, P |
35.4 |
- - - |
7 |
120 |
0.48 |
| Hungary [23] |
171 (171) / 165 (165) |
40 in 20 (26) or 50 in 25 (33) 2 fields, P |
35.4 or 43.2 |
- - - |
42 |
>60 |
0.44 |
| ICRF-UK [24] |
228 (228) / 239 (239) |
15 in 3 (5–7) 2 fields, P |
22.5 |
- 10% - |
<2 |
60 |
0.64 |
| Stockholm-I [25] |
424 (424) / 425 (425) |
25 in 5 (5–7) 2 fields, G |
37.5 |
- 12% - |
<7 |
107 |
0.74 |
| MRC-II [26] |
139 (139) / 140 (140) |
40 in 20 (28) 2 fields, P |
35.4 |
1% 5% 4% |
<7 |
>60 |
0.83 |
| NW-UK [27] |
143 (143) / 141 (141) |
20 in 4 (4) 3 field, P |
30.0 |
- 1% 3% |
<7 |
96 |
0.57 |
| Sweden [28] |
583 (573) / 585 (574) |
25 in 5 (5) 3–4 fields, P |
37.5 |
3% 1%§ - |
<7 |
>60 |
0.82 |
| Stockholm-II [29] |
272 (272) / 285 (285) |
25 in 5 (5–7) 4 fields, P |
37.7 |
-------5%------ |
<7 |
50 |
0.88 |
| Dutch [38] |
924 (908) / 937 (897) |
25 in 5 (5) 4 fields, P |
37.5 |
3% 2% ? |
<7 |
24.9 |
0.81 |
|
Note: EORTC indicates European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; ICRF-UK, Imperial Cancer Research Fund United Kingdom; MRC, Medical Research Council; NW-UK, Northwest Region Rectal Cancer Group United Kingdom; VASOG, Veterans Administration Surgical Oncology Group. * Total dose in Gy, number of fractions, (duration of treatment in days), number of treatment fields, target volume (G, guitar-shaped; P, pelvic). † 0 indicates per cent of patients receiving no treatment; <1, percent receiving less than planned treatment; >1, percent receiving more than planned treatment. ‡ Based on independent assessment by five reviewers using the Detsky instrument10. § 5% of patients also received RT over >7 days, and 8% of patients received radiation through a two portal beam. | |||||||
Figueredo et al. BMC Medicine 2003 1:1 doi:10.1186/1741-7015-1-1 |
|||||||