Research article
Regeneration and reprogramming compared
- † Equal contributors
1 Center for Regenerative Medicine of Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
2 Gene Expression Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
3 Current address: INDEGSAL, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
4 Current address: Department of Molecular Biology, University of León, 24071, León, Spain
BMC Biology 2010, 8:5 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-5
Published: 20 January 2010Additional files
Additional file 1:
Figure S1: Statistical relevance of changes in expression levels. Effect sizes (mean ± error) for each regeneration time point on the intercept, for zebrafish pluripotency associated makers and blastema markers. Oblong stage (for pluripotency markers) and 48 hpa (for blastema markers) were the intercept of the models. Asterisks represent statistical differences with the intercept.
Format: PDF Size: 138KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
Additional file 2:
Figure S2: Cell divisions in non- regenerating and regenerating fin. Immunohistochemistry of phospho-Histone H3 localization in zebrafish fins: 0 hours (A) and 48 hours (B) post amputation.
Format: PDF Size: 73KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
