Table 3 |
|||||||
|
Comparison of Griesemer's classification (material aspect, columns) with ours (informational aspect, rows) |
|||||||
|
Material aspect |
|||||||
|
No overlap |
Overlap |
||||||
|
No development* |
Development* |
||||||
|
Informational/dynamical aspect |
No multiplication |
No replication |
Transcription, translation |
Dissipation, segregation (sensu Griesemer) metabolic networks |
Non-replicating somatic cells |
||
|
|
|||||||
|
Multiplication |
No heredity |
Non-informational replication |
? |
Formose reaction |
? |
||
|
|
|||||||
|
Heredity |
No development* |
Informational replication |
Copying (sensu Griesemer) crystal growth, ribozymes, prions |
Semi-conservative DNA replication |
? |
||
|
|
|||||||
|
Development* |
Reproduction |
(Self-bootstrapping complex entities) |
? |
Reproduction (sensu Griesemer) cells, organisms, chemoton |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
*Our definition of development differs from Griesemer's. It does not necessarily include material overlap, but is taken to be a process during which the final entity is made from the information inherited from the parent (template). Therefore, it is also possible to have entities in the 'development/no development' cells. |
|||||||
|
Zachar and Szathmáry BMC Biology 2010 8:21 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-21 |
|||||||