Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch article

Features of the ancestral bilaterian inferred from Platynereis dumerilii ParaHox genes

Jerome HL Hui1,7 email, Florian Raible2,3 email, Natalia Korchagina1 email, Nicolas Dray4,8 email, Sylvie Samain5 email, Ghislaine Magdelenat5 email, Claire Jubin5 email, Béatrice Segurens5 email, Guillaume Balavoine4,9 email, Detlev Arendt2 email and David EK Ferrier1,6 email

1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

2EMBL, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany

3MFPL, Vienna, Austria

4CNRS-CGM, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

5Génoscope, Centre National de Séquençage, Evry, France

6The Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK

7Faculty of Life Sciences, Michael Smith Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

8Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, USA

9Institut Jacques Monod, UMR 7592 CNRS/Université Denis Diderot – Paris VII, Paris, France

author email corresponding author email

BMC Biology 2009, 7:43doi:10.1186/1741-7007-7-43

Published: 23 July 2009

Abstract

Background

The ParaHox gene cluster is the evolutionary sister to the Hox cluster. Whilst the role of the Hox cluster in patterning the anterior-posterior axis of bilaterian animals is well established, and the organisation of vertebrate Hox clusters is intimately linked to gene regulation, much less is known about the more recently discovered ParaHox cluster. ParaHox gene clustering, and its relationship to expression, has only been described in deuterostomes. Conventional protostome models (Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans) are secondarily derived with respect to ParaHox genes, suffering gene loss and cluster break-up.

Results

We provide the first evidence for ParaHox gene clustering from a less-derived protostome animal, the annelid Platynereis dumerilii. Clustering of these genes is thus not a sole preserve of the deuterostome lineage within Bilateria. This protostome ParaHox cluster is not entirely intact however, with Pdu-Cdx being on the opposite end of the same chromosome arm from Pdu-Gsx and Pdu-Xlox. From the genomic sequence around the P. dumerilii ParaHox genes the neighbouring genes are identified, compared with other taxa, and the ancestral arrangement deduced.

Conclusion

We relate the organisation of the ParaHox genes to their expression, and from comparisons with other taxa hypothesise that a relatively complex pattern of ParaHox gene expression existed in the protostome-deuterostome ancestor, which was secondarily simplified along several invertebrate lineages. Detailed comparisons of the gene content around the ParaHox genes enables the reconstruction of the genome surrounding the ParaHox cluster of the protostome-deuterostome ancestor, which existed over 550 million years ago.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.