Table 3 |
||||
|
Differences between the gene repertoires of Staurastrum, Zygnema, Chaetosphaeridium and Marchantia cpDNAs |
||||
|
Genea |
Staurastrum |
Zygnema |
Chaetosphaeridium |
Marchantia |
|
|
||||
|
chlI |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
cysA |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
|
cysT |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
|
odpB |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
rpl5 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
rpl22 |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
|
rpl32 |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
|
rps16 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
tufA |
- |
- |
+c |
- |
|
ycf62 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
trnP(ggg) |
- |
+ |
+ |
-b |
|
trnS(cga) |
-b |
+ |
- |
- |
|
|
||||
|
a Only the conserved genes that are missing in one or more chloroplast genomes are indicated. Plus and minus signs denote the presence and absence of genes, respectively. b Pseudogenes. c Chaetosphaeridium tufA could be a pseudogene because its sequence is highly divergent from those of other green plants. |
||||
|
Turmel et al. BMC Biology 2005 3:22 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-3-22 |
||||