Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC International Health and Human Rights and BioMed Central.

Open Access Study protocol

A participatory intervention to improve the mental health of widows of injecting drug users in north-east India as a strategy for HIV prevention

Alexandra Devine1*, Michelle Kermode2, Prabha Chandra3 and Helen Herrman4

Author affiliations

1 Australian International Health Institute, Alan Gilbert Building, Level 5 Barry St, University of Melbourne, Carlton, 3010, Victoria, Australia

2 Australian International Health Alan Gilbert Building, Level 5 Barry St, University of Melbourne, Carlton, 3010, Victoria, Australia

3 Dept. of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, Hosur Road Bangalore – 560029, India

4 Australian International Health Alan Gilbert Building, Level 5 Barry St, University of Melbourne, Carlton, 3010, Victoria, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC International Health and Human Rights 2007, 7:3  doi:10.1186/1472-698X-7-3

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/7/3


Received:25 February 2007
Accepted:19 April 2007
Published:19 April 2007

© 2007 Devine et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Manipur and Nagaland, in the north-east of India, are classified as high prevalence states for HIV, and intravenous drug use is an important route of transmission. Most injecting drug users (IDUs) are men, an estimated 40% are married, and death rates have been high in the last five years, consequently the number of widows of IDUs has increased. Many of these widows and their children are HIV-infected and experience poor health, discrimination, and impoverishment; all factors likely to be compromising their mental health. People with poor mental health are more likely to engage in HIV risk behaviours. Mental health can be promoted by public health actions with vulnerable population groups.

Methods

We designed an intervention study to assess the feasibility and impact of a participatory action process to promote the mental health and well-being of widows of IDUs in Manipur and Nagaland, as a strategy for reducing the risk of engagement in HIV risk behaviours. This paper describes the background and rationale for the study, the intervention, and the study methods in detail.

Results

Pending analysis.

Conclusion

This intervention study will make a significant contribution to the emerging evidence that supports associations between mental health and HIV. The concept of promoting mental health among women who are vulnerable to HIV infection or already infected as a strategy for HIV prevention in a development setting is breaking new ground.

Background

HIV/AIDS in north-east India

Two of the north-east states of India, Manipur and Nagaland, are classified as high prevalence states for HIV (HIV prevalence in antenatal women >1%) [1]. Intravenous drug use (IDU) in these states is an important route of HIV transmission [2]. A constellation of social factors including political instability, unemployment, and easy availability of heroin from across the Myanmar border and cheap narcotic-based pharmaceutical agents, all contribute to a high prevalence of injecting drug use in this part of the world, especially among young men [3,4]. Recent reports estimate that injecting drug users (IDUs) constitute 1.9–2.7% of the adult population [2]. In 2005, the HIV prevalence among IDUs in Manipur and Nagaland was estimated to be 24% and 5% respectively, representing an increase in both states from the previous year (NACO 2006). In a sample of IDUs in the north-east, 75% were found to be HIV positive [2].

Most IDUs are men, an estimated 40% are married [5], and death rates have been high in the last five years; consequently the number of widows of IDUs has increased [4]. HIV transmission from IDUs to their sexual partners and wives has been documented [2,6]. Women in India are often socially and economically disadvantaged following the death of their husband. For widows of injecting drug users (IDUs) the situation is arguably worse due to their increased risk of infection with HIV and other blood-borne viruses, and the increased likelihood of stigma and discrimination.

A situation assessment conducted among widows of IDUs in Manipur during 2004 found that many were faced with a range of socio-economic, health and psychosocial problems, including poverty, grief, loneliness, discrimination, illness associated with HIV infection, difficulty providing care and support for their children (some of whom are also living with HIV); all factors likely to be compromising their mental health [7]. Some widows reported engaging in HIV risk behaviours including alcohol and substance misuse, sex work and unprotected sex. Accessing HIV prevention services was not a priority for these women who were predominantly concerned about livelihood issues and their children's well-being [7]. Additionally, insurgent groups in both states target IDUs and sex workers with public humiliation and violence, driving these populations underground and making it difficult to reach them with HIV prevention programs.

With this situation assessment in mind, we designed an intervention study that uses a participatory action process to promote the mental health and well-being of widows of IDUs in Manipur and Nagaland, as a strategy for reducing engagement in HIV risk behaviours. This paper outlines the background and rationale for the intervention, and then describes the study design in detail.

Links between mental health and HIV/AIDS

A growing body of evidence links mental health with HIV/AIDS in a range of ways. People with poor mental health, including those with untreated mental illnesses such as depression tend to have impaired judgement, impulsive behaviour, reduced fear of consequences, and increased vulnerability to outside influences, and as a result are more likely to engage in HIV risk behaviours [3,8]. Interactions between drug and alcohol use and depression are common, often leading to a decreased concern for personal safety. This has important implications for HIV prevention but limited relevant research has been conducted in India and elsewhere [3,8-10].

People living with HIV/AIDS have an increased risk of developing mental health problems including depression and substance misuse [3,9]. These conditions adversely affect HIV/AIDS treatment adherence, contribute to risk behaviours and exacerbate social difficulties associated with stigma and discrimination. In itself, depression is at present the greatest overall source of disability in the world [8]. Integrating mental health interventions with HIV/AIDS care has the potential to benefit both the mental and physical health of people living with HIV/AIDS [3,8-10].

Mental health promotion

Mental health is described by WHO as an integral component of health, and as: 'a state of well-being in which the individual realises his or her own abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to his or her community' [11]. Mental health is not simply the absence of mental illness. It is the foundation for well-being and effective functioning of individuals and communities [12]. Poor mental health predisposes people to mental illnesses, which are common in all populations. Mental illnesses are associated in all settings with indicators of poverty; including low levels of education, poor housing and low income [13], and with other illnesses including HIV infection [9]. Substance misuse, violence and health problems such as HIV and depression are more prevalent and more difficult to cope with in conditions of low income, limited education and unemployment [14].

Emerging evidence indicates that mental health can be promoted by public health actions with vulnerable population groups [12]. Just as physical health can be promoted, so too can mental health. A recent WHO report [12] draws on a public health framework proposed initially by the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation [15,16] that identifies three key social and economic determinants of community and individual mental health: social inclusion, freedom from discrimination and violence, and access to economic resources.

Social inclusion is characterised by strong social relationships and networks, involvement in community activities and civic engagement. Social exclusion refers to the process whereby an individual or group is disconnected from the socio-economic, political and cultural system of their community. People who experience social exclusion are more at risk of poor mental and physical health [15].

Discrimination is the process by which members of a socially defined group are treated differently (generally unfairly) because of their membership of that group. People may experience many forms of discrimination based on race, ethnicity, sex, age and religion. Discrimination is associated with reduced well-being, low self esteem and major depression [15]

Access to economic resources refers not only to employment but also to factors that promote employment such as education. It also includes being able to feed, clothe and house oneself and one's family. People without sufficient access to economic resources are at higher risk of poor mental health [15].

Mental health promotion aims to achieve better mental health and wellbeing by improving the social, physical and economic environments that influence mental health [15]. Psychosocial and environmental factors influence (protect or negate) a number of health behaviours. Actions to promote mental health can be designed to foster protective factors in individuals such as coping capacity and resilience; increase connections between individuals and communities; create opportunities for income generation and employment; assist in community mobilisation; and address stigma and discrimination [15].

Participatory interventions in health development

While evidence exists that behaviour change communication interventions contribute to a reduction in HIV risk behaviours, it is also clear that high risk behaviours continue to increase in some parts of the world [17]. Interventions designed to reduce HIV risk need to extend to the broader range of mental health promotion actions noted above, and include community participation. While the health benefits of community participation are well understood in development work, health policy does not always reflect this, partly because the evidence related to this approach is limited.

Our intervention study draws on participatory action research (PAR) approaches to health development. PAR seeks to empower the target community to actively participate in research and development activities, to identify problems and develop solutions in relation to particular research questions. This enhances self-confidence and leadership skills, and assists communities to address their own health and social needs [18-20].

A recent study has demonstrated that community based participatory action can have a significant positive effect on health outcomes, such as maternal and infant survival and morbidity [21]. The Mother and Infant Research Activities (MIRA) Makwanpur trial in Nepal is a leading example of the use of participatory interventions in health development and begins to fill a gap in the evidence base for effectiveness regarding the use of such interventions [22,23]. This trial was a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a community-based participatory intervention to reduce peri-natal and neonatal mortality rates in rural Nepal. The trial aimed to build on community planning and decision making to improve maternal and newborn care through the development of 111 women's groups. These groups were randomised into 42 clusters, and half were involved with the participatory intervention; both the control and intervention groups received improvements in health care services [23].

The intervention involved training local women to facilitate monthly meetings through a participatory action cycle of problem identification, community planning, implementation and evaluation of strategies to address the identified problems. Of the 111 women's groups, 77 went on to develop and implement strategies to address peri-natal health problems and 100 groups continued to meet to discuss peri-natal health. The trial resulted in a reduction in neonatal mortality by 30% in the intervention cluster. It also resulted in a significant decline in maternal mortality [23].

Community based participatory research is neglected in many health fields, including mental health. Similarly, the likely connections between community participation, social cohesion and the mental health of vulnerable populations, and the impact of these on HIV risk behaviours are poorly researched and merit attention.

Appreciative Inquiry

Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is an approach to development that highlights local community strengths (relationships and assets), achievements and visions, rather than the more conventional focus on community problems, deficiencies and needs. AI assists communities to design and apply their own strategies to promote positive and sustainable change [24-26].

The AI cycle moves through four phases; Discovery, Dreaming, Designing, and Delivery/Destiny. Information about the health issue and local attributes and successes are used by the community to create a vision of what they can achieve if their strengths are mobilised. The community develops and applies strategies to address the health problem [24-26]. The AI approach underpins the intervention outlined in the following section.

We hypothesised that the development of structured and facilitated participatory action groups (PAGs) among widows of IDUs, with a focus on promoting mental health and well-being and informed by a strengths-based approach, will be associated with: (1) improved mental health; and (2) a reduced likelihood of engagement in HIV risk behaviours. We designed the following intervention study to explore this possibility.

Methods

Objectives

The objectives of the study are to:

1. Learn about the women's perspectives on mental health and well-being and the links between mental health and HIV

2. Assess changes in the women's quality of life and well-being during the course of the PAG meetings

3. Assess changes in engagement in HIV risk behaviours

4. Describe the process and outcome of the PAGs from the perspective of the women

5. Document the process of establishing and conducting the PAGs so it can be repeated or adapted in the future.

Widows of IDUs are defined for the purpose of the study as women whose husband or partner has died from a HIV/AIDS-related illness or from an IDU-related condition (such as overdose).

Ethical approval

Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee and the Emmanuel Hospital Association (EHA) Institutional Review Board in early 2006. The study is funded by the United Kingdom's Department for International Development (DFID) through the Research and Learning Fund. A psychiatrist was identified in each state to provide a referral point for any participant experiencing a serious mental health problem.

Research and local partnerships

Organisational partnerships have been formed between: (1); The Australian International Health Institute (AIHI) from the University of Melbourne; (2); Project ORCHID, which is collaboration between AIHI and a large Indian non-government organisation (NGO), the Emmanuel Hospital Association (EHA), which aims to increase the HIV prevention capacity of a network of NGOs in Manipur and Nagaland, and is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; and (3), six local NGOs, three from each state.

The inception phase of the study involved identification of three local partner NGOs in each state. Partner NGOs were consulted regarding the purpose, methods and feasibility of the study. By establishing partnerships with local NGOs the study hopes to enhance their knowledge and understanding of mental health and their capacity to work in the area, as well as increase their focus and service delivery for widows of IDUs.

Two state-based research teams were formed, one for each state. Each research team consisted of one research officer, and three NGO liaison workers (one nominated representative from each NGO). Two widows from each of the six PAGs will take the role of peer facilitator. The research officer will oversee the PAG process, provide guidance and support to the liaison workers and facilitators, collect and translate data and contribute to data analysis. The liaison workers will provide support to the facilitators, assist in documentation of the process and ensure that partner NGOs are engaged.

Each NGO brought together a group of widows for an information session during which the women were told about the intervention and the study and invited to participate. Three PAGs have been established in each state with 10–15 widows in each group.

Training

The next phase of the study involved training the research teams. The objectives of the training were to provide an understanding of the background and rationale for the intervention and the study and to prepare the team members for the intervention and accompanying data collection. Training for the research officers and NGO liaison workers included; an overview of research, ethics, qualitative and quantitative research methods, mental health promotion, the links between mental health and HIV, PAR and AI. Training was participatory and included techniques and exercises that could also be utilised during facilitation of the PAG meetings. Following this, the research officers and NGO liaison workers actively assisted with the training of the peer facilitators. The training emphasised the importance of ensuring that the PAG process is a positive experience for facilitators and participants, and facilitators were trained in activities to help the groups identify strengths and to promote enjoyment of the sessions.

The intervention

The intervention consists of ten peer facilitated PAG meetings for widows of IDUs. The research officers and NGO liaison workers will attend the meetings when data collection occurs and as requested by the participants and peer facilitators. The PAGs will be held every fortnight for half a day over a twenty week period. An outline of the PAG process is summarised in Table 1. The women's travel and childcare costs will be covered and refreshments provided at each session. The meeting venues, which are a secure and comfortable area for the women to meet, are being provided by the partner NGOs ensure. All meetings will be participatory, strengths-based and comprise a combination of structured activities and open discussion, with a focus on the key factors identified in the framework for mental health promotion (social inclusion, freedom from discrimination and access to economic resources). Written guidelines for each session have been developed and will be adapted by the local teams to suit the needs of each group. It is hoped that the IDU widows will ultimately own and lead the process, and that it will enhance their awareness of mental health as an important aspect of health, as well as increase their capacity to take action to improve their own lives. In the later stages of the intervention each group will participate in an action planning process to develop strategies for promoting mental health and the sustainability of the groups.

Table 1. Outline of the ten Participatory Action Group meetings for widows of IDUs

It is anticipated that the groups will continue to meet after the project is completed with support from the NGOs, some of which already provide services to widows of IDUs.

Data collection

A range of quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to assist with documentation of the PAG process and assessing the impact of the process on the lives of the women. While it is important to ensure that enough data are collected to facilitate assessment of the intervention, it is also important not to over-burden the women with a demanding schedule of data collection.

Quantitative methods

Three brief questionnaires will be completed by the women at the first and the last PAG session to assess changes in their quality of life and engagement in HIV risk behaviours. The questionnaires are: a short version of the WHO Quality of Life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ12) [27]; and a Health Risk Questionnaire developed specifically for the study. The WHOQOL-BREF and the GHQ12 are usually self-administered but assisted administration is possible for people with low literacy. The value of using the WHOQOL-BREF and GHQ12 is that they are standardised and have been used in other states of India, enabling comparisons on measures of mental health and wellbeing. The questionnaires have been translated into local languages, back translated and piloted with literate and non-literate women. The research teams and peer facilitators assessed the sensitivity and appropriateness of all questions before they were included in the study.

Qualitative methods

Two focus group discussions (FGDs) will be conducted during the study. The first FGD will be conducted during the second PAG meeting and focuses on concepts and determinants of mental health for women generally and for widows of IDUs specifically, and strategies for enhancing mental health. The second FGD will be conducted in the ninth session with a focus on the links between women's mental health and HIV. Indicative themes for this FGD include the impact of HIV on women's mental health and the relationship between mental health and engagement in HIV risk behaviours. The FGD question guides were developed in collaboration with the local research teams and informed by the literature and the purpose of the project. The transcripts from the FGDs will be translated into English by the research officers and analysed collaboratively.

The Most Significant Change (MSC) approach will be used to evaluate the impact of the intervention from the perspective of the women. MSC is a qualitative, participatory approach to monitoring and evaluation used in development projects. In this study, we will collect 'stories of change' from the PAG participants and systematically select those stories that best represent the most significant change. The reasons why particular stories are selected will be documented [28,29].

Finally the research officers, NGO liaison workers and peer facilitators will gather at the end of each meeting to document the PAG process so that it can be repeated or adapted in the future.

Results

Pending analysis

Discussion and conclusion

This intervention study is expected to (1) develop an understanding of the women's perspectives on mental health and well-being and the links between mental health & HIV; (2) raise awareness of the importance of mental health among a group of vulnerable women; (3) assess the capacity of the intervention to improve the women's quality of life and well-being and its potential to reduce engagement in HIV risk behaviours; (4) assess the feasibility of working with groups of vulnerable women to develop action plans for promoting mental health; (5) develop local capacity in research participation; and (6) promote better links between the IDU widows and the NGOs working in HIV prevention.

A dissemination workshop will be held at the end of the study so that the findings can be shared with funders, government agencies, NGOs and participants, in order to inform future strategies to improve the mental health and well-being of widows of IDUs and to improve their access to existing services.

Finally, we hope to contribute to the evidence in relation to the use of community based participatory interventions to promote mental health in development settings and the potential for these interventions to contribute to HIV prevention strategies.

Abbreviations

AI – Appreciative Inquiry

AIHI – Australian International Health Institute

AIDS – Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome

DFID – Department for International Development

EHA – Emmanuel Hospital Association

FGD – Focus Group Discussion

GHQ12 – General Health Questionnaire 12

HIV – Human Immuno Deficiency Virus

IDUs – Injecting Drug Use/Users

MSC – Most Significant Change

NGO – Non Governmental Organization

NGO liaison worker – Non Government Organization liaison worker

NIMHANS – National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences

PAG – Participatory Action Group

PAR – Participatory Action Research

WHO – World Health Organization

WHOQOL BREF – WHO Quality of Life Abbreviated tool

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HH, AD and MK were involved in conception of the study. HH, AD, MK and PC were involved in design of the study. AD and MK drafted the paper with contributions from HH and PC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The study and authors are funded by the United Kingdom's Department for International Development (DFID) through the Research and Learning Fund. The authors acknowledge the many NGOs and individuals that have collaborated on the study with the invaluable local insight and support including Sneha Bhavan, Manipur Network of Positive People, Lamka Rehabilitation & Research Centre Evangelical Baptist Convention, Development Association of Nagaland, Nagaland Mothers Association HIV/AIDS Care Hospice, Guardian Angel, Youth Action Resource Development. The authors would also like to thank members of the MIRA Makwanpur trial for their advice on participatory interventions and training.

References

  1. National AIDS Control Organization: HIV/AIDS Epidemiological Surveillance & Estimation Report for the year 2005. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2006.

  2. Chandrasekaran P, Dallabetta G, Loo V, Rao S, Gayle H, Alexander A: Containing HIV/AIDS in India: the unfinished agenda.

    Lancet Infectious Disease 2006, 6:508-521. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Chandra PS, Desai G, Ranjan S: HIV & psychiatric disorders.

    Indian Journal of Medical Research 2005, 121:445-467. OpenURL

  4. Population Health Institute: Assessment of Situation and Response on CSWs in Manipur, 2005. Population Health Institute; 2005.

  5. Singh HD, Sharma M: The Rapid Situation Assessment of Drug Use in Imphal (1999–2000.). Kripa Society; 2000.

  6. Chakrabarti S, Panda S, Chatterjee A: HIV-1 subtypes in injecting drug user & their non-injetcing wives in Manipur, India.

    Indian Journal of Medical Research 2000, 111:189-94. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  7. Waikhom R: A situation assessment amongst widows of injecting drug users engaged in sex work and their peers in Manipur. Edited by Kermode M, Thomson A. Australian International Health Institute, University of Melbourne in collaboration with Emmanuel Hospital Association;

  8. Baingana F, Thomas R, Comblain C: HIV/AIDS and Mental Health.

    World Bank, Health, Nutrition and Population 2005. OpenURL

  9. Freeman M, Patel V, Collins P, Bertolote J: Integrating mental health in global initiatives for HIV/AIDS.

    The British Journal of Psychiatry 2005, 187:1-3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. World Health Organization: Promoting Mental Health, Concepts, Emerging evidence, Practice, Summary Report, A report of the World Health Organization. Edited by Herrman H, Saxena S, Moodie R. WHO Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and The University of Melbourne; 2005.

  11. World Health Organization: Promoting Mental Health, Concepts, Emerging evidence, Practice. Edited by Herrman H, Saxena S, Moodie R. WHO Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and The University of Melbourne; 2005.

  12. Herrman H, Saxena S, Moodie R, Walker L: Promoting mental health as a public health priority. In Promoting Mental Health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice. Geneva. World Health Organization; 2005. OpenURL

  13. Patel V, Kleinman A: Poverty and common mental disorders in developing countries.

    Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003, 81:609-615. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Desjarlais R, Eisenberg L, Good B, Kleinman A: World Mental Health: Problems and Priorities in Low-Income Countries.

    OUP 1995. OpenURL

  15. Walker L, Verins I, Moodie R, Webster K: Responding to the Social and Economic Determinants of Mental Health: A Conceptual Framework for Action. In Promoting Mental Health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice. Edited by Herrman H, Saxena S, Moodie R. WHO; 2005. OpenURL

  16. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation: A Plan for Action 2005-2007, Promoting Mental Health and Wellbeing. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation; 2005.

  17. Elford J, Hart G: If HIV prevention works, why are rates of high-risk sexual behaviour increasing among MSM.

    AIDS Education and Prevention 2003, 15:294-308. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Adderley-Kelly B, Green PM: Strategies for successful conduct of research with low-income African American populations.

    Nursing Outlook 2005, 53:147-52. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Busza J, Schunter BT: From competition to community: participatory learning and action among young, debt-bonded Vietnamese sex workers in Cambodia.

    Reproductive Health Matters 2001, 9(17):72-81. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Olshansky E, Sacco D, Braxter B, Dodge P, Hughes E, Ondeck M, Stubbs ML, Upvall MJ: Participatory action research to understand and reduce health disparities.

    Nursing Outlook 2005, 53:121-6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Costello A, Osrin D, Manandhar D: Reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in the poorest communities.

    British Medical Journal 2004, 329:1166-1168. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  22. Manandhar DS, Osrin D, Shrestha BP, Mesko N, Morrison J, Tumbahangphe KM, Tameng S, Thapa S, Shrestha D, Thapa B, Shrestha JR, Wade A, Borghi J, Standing H, Manandhar M, Costello A: Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial.

    The Lancet Health Module 2004, 364:9438. OpenURL

  23. Morrison J, Tamang S, Mesko N, Osrin D, Shrestha B, manandhar M, Manandhar D, Standing H, Costello A: Women's health groups to improve perinatal care in rural Nepal.

    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2005., 5(6) OpenURL

  24. International Institute for Sustainable Development: Appreciative Inquiry & Community Development, from Problems to Strength. International Institute for Sustainable Development; 2000.

  25. Fosters M, Mathie A: Situating Asset-Based Community Development in the International Development Context. Coady International Institute; 2001.

  26. Ashford G, Patkar S: The Positive Path, Using Appreciative Inquiry in Rural Indian Communities. Department of International Development, Institute for Sustainable Development and Myrada; 2001.

  27. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, Rutter C: The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care.

    Psychological Medicine 1997, 27(1):191-197. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Dart J, Drysdale G, Cole D, Saddington M: The Most Significant Change approach for monitoring an Australian Extension project.

    PLA Notes: International Institute for Environment and Development 2000, 38:47-53. OpenURL

  29. Davies R, Dart J: The 'Most Significant Change" (MSC) Technique, A Guide to its Use.

    2004.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/7/3/prepub