 DebateCommunity based rehabilitation: a strategy for peace-buildingWilliam Boyce1 , Michael Koros2 and Jennifer Hodgson3  1
Community Health and Epidemiology and Education, Queen's University, Kingston Ontario Canada, K7L 3N6 2
Canadian International Development Agency, Central & Eastern European Branch, Hull Ouebec, Canada, K1A 0G4 3
International Programs, Faculty of Arts & Science, Queen's University, Kingston Ontario Canada, K7L 3N6 author email corresponding author email
BMC International Health and Human Rights 2002,
2:6doi:10.1186/1472-698X-2-6
|
|
| Published: |
4 November 2002 |
Abstract
Background
Certain features of peace-building distinguish it from peacekeeping, and make it an appropriate strategy in dealing with vertical conflict and low intensity conflict. However, some theorists suggest that attempts, through peace-building, to impose liberal values upon non-democratic cultures are misguided and lack an ethical basis.
Discussion
We have been investigating the peace-building properties of community based approaches to disability in a number of countries. This paper describes the practice and impact of peace-building through Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR) strategies in the context of armed conflict. The ethical basis for peace-building through practical community initiatives is explored. A number of benefits and challenges to using CBR strategies for peace-building purposes are identified.
Summary
During post-conflict reconstruction, disability is a powerful emotive lever that can be used to mobilize cooperation between factions. We suggest that civil society, in contrast to state-level intervention, has a valuable role in reducing the risks of conflict through community initiatives. |