Table 3

Tobit regression analysis of potential factors influencing the technical efficiency scores

TE score

n (%)

Coef

Std. Err

p

95% CI


HEW from tabia

None

27 (45.0)

Ref

One

30 (50.0)

-0.063

0.116

0.588

-0.297 - 0.170

Both

3 (5.0)

-0.098

0.262

0.708

-0.626 - 0.428

HEW married

Both

27 (45.0)

Ref

One

21 (35.0)

-0.070

0.141

0.618

-0.354 - 0.212

None

12 (20.0)

-0.012

0.182

0.946

-0.380 - 0.355

HEW pregnant last year

Both

6 (10.0)

Ref

One

21 (35.0)

-0.295

0.198

0.143

-0.694 - 0.103

None

33 (55.0)

-0.139

0.210

0.510

-0.561 - 0.283

Number of children

3-5

13 (21.6)

Ref

1-2

33 (55.0)

0.086

0.131

0.512

-0.178 - 0.351

None

14 (23.3)

0.079

0.160

0.623

-0.243 - 0.402

Support from tabias' chief

Little

16 (26.6)

Ref

Moderate

27 (45.0)

0.044

0.130

0.733

-0.217 - 0.307

High

17 (28.3)

0.074

0.148

0.618

-0.223 - 0.372

Tabia population*

5850.6 (1469.8)

0.000

0.000

0.487

-0.000 - 0.000

Distance to health post*

11.9 (7.2)

0.010

0.007

0.186

-0.005 - 0.026

_cons

0.480

0.331

0.154

-0.186 - 1.147

/sigma

0.376

0.042

0.291 - 0.462


* mean (standard deviation)

Sebastian and Lemma BMC International Health and Human Rights 2010 10:16   doi:10.1186/1472-698X-10-16

Open Data