Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Health Services Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Rapid spread of complex change: a case study in inpatient palliative care

Richard Della Penna1, Helene Martel2, Esther B Neuwirth2*, Jennifer Rice3, Marta I Filipski2, Jennifer Green4 and Jim Bellows2

Author Affiliations

1 Kaiser Permanente Aging Network, One Kaiser Plaza, 16th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612, USA

2 Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, One Kaiser Plaza, 16th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612, USA

3 School of Public Health, University of California, 50 University Hall #7360, Berkeley, CA 94712, USA

4 Caduceus Strategies, 1735 High Street SE, Salem, OR 97302, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:245  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-245

Published: 29 December 2009

Abstract

Background

Based on positive findings from a randomized controlled trial, Kaiser Permanente's national executive leadership group set an expectation that all Kaiser Permanente and partner hospitals would implement a consultative model of interdisciplinary, inpatient-based palliative care (IPC). Within one year, the number of IPC consultations program-wide increased almost tenfold from baseline, and the number of teams nearly doubled. We report here results from a qualitative evaluation of the IPC initiative after a year of implementation; our purpose was to understand factors supporting or impeding the rapid and consistent spread of a complex program.

Methods

Quality improvement study using a case study design and qualitative analysis of in-depth semi-structured interviews with 36 national, regional, and local leaders.

Results

Compelling evidence of impacts on patient satisfaction and quality of care generated 'pull' among adopters, expressed as a remarkably high degree of conviction about the value of the model. Broad leadership agreement gave rise to sponsorship and support that permeated the organization. A robust social network promoted knowledge exchange and built on an existing network with a strong interest in palliative care. Resource constraints, pre-existing programs of a different model, and ambiguous accountability for implementation impeded spread.

Conclusions

A complex, hospital-based, interdisciplinary intervention in a large health care organization spread rapidly due to a synergy between organizational 'push' strategies and grassroots-level pull. The combination of push and pull may be especially important when the organizational context or the practice to be spread is complex.