Table 6 |
||
|
Key findings of the 2004 - 2007 Peer Review Programme of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer services in English NHS acute trusts [12]. |
||
|
Aspect of care |
Peer Review results |
|
|
|
||
|
Referral pathways |
55% of the networks had referral guidelines agreed for diagnostic referral to secondary care |
49% of the networks had guidelines agreed for referrals from secondary to tertiary care. |
|
Network structure |
There were significant gaps across all cancer sites in provision of oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative medicine consultants and clinical nurse specialists. |
37% of networks had specialist surgical teams with a 24-hour on-call rota (i.e. contained a minimum of 3 surgeons). There was wide regional variation in this from 13% (East) to 60% (South). |
|
MDT structure |
Units and centres had established their core MDTs in almost 100% of networks. Cover arrangements for core members (in case of annual leave etc) were in place overall in 58% of centres and 44% of units. |
46% of cancer centres and 33% of local units achieved the standard of core members attending half of the MDT meetings |
|
Clinical Nurse Specialist provision |
The number of clinical nurse specialists per MDT was 1.4 for centres and 0.85 for units. |
There was no clinical nurse specialist cover in 14% of cancer centres and 31% of local units, problems with workload and cover were reported in more than 20 centres and 30 units. |
|
|
||
|
Palser et al. BMC Health Services Research 2009 9:204 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-204 |
||