Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gerjo Kok |
20 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gozde Ozakinci |
26 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mary Wells |
27 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Francis |
27 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Cote |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
4 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mary Wells |
14 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Francis |
12 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Cote |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
29 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Cote |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
3 Jul 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Jul 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-113 |
You can find further information about peer review here.