Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch article

Hospital emergency department utilisation rates among the immigrant population in Barcelona, Spain

Andrea Buron1,2,4 email, Francesc Cots1 email, Oscar Garcia3,4 email, Oriol Vall3,4 email and Xavier Castells1,4 email

Health Services Evaluation and Clinical Epidemiology Department, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Educational Unit of Preventive Medicine and Public Health IMAS-UPF-ASPB, Barcelona, Spain

Neuropsychopharmacology Programme, Childhood and Environment Research Unit, Paediatric Unit, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Departament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia, i Medicina Preventiva, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

author email corresponding author email

BMC Health Services Research 2008, 8:51doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-51

Published: 3 March 2008

Abstract

Background

The recent increase in the number of immigrants of Barcelona represents a challenge for the public healthcare system, the emergency department being the most used healthcare service by this group. However, utilisation rates in our environment have not yet been studied. We aimed to compare emergency department utilisation rates between Spanish-born and foreign-born residents in a public hospital of Barcelona.

Methods

The study population included all adults residing in the area of study and visiting the emergency department of Hospital del Mar in 2004. The emergency care episodes were selected from the Emergency Department register, and the population figures from the Statistics Department of Barcelona. Emergency care episodes were classified into five large clinical categories. Adjusted rate ratios (RR) of utilisation among foreign-born vs. Spanish-born residents were assessed through negative binomial regression.

Results

The overall utilisation rate was 382 emergency contacts per 1,000 persons-years. The RR for foreign-born versus Spanish-born residents was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52; 0.74%). The RR was also significantly below one in surgery (0.51, 95% CI: 0.42; 0.63), traumatology (0.47, 95% CI: 0.38; 0.59), medicine (0.48, 95% CI: 0.38; 0.59) and psychiatry (0.42, 95% CI: 0.18; 0.97). No differences were found in utilisation of gynaecology and minor emergency services.

Conclusion

The overall lower utilisation rates obtained for foreign-born residents is consistent with previous studies and is probably due to the "healthy immigrant effect". Thus, the population increase due to immigration does not translate directly into a corresponding increase in the number of emergency contacts. The lack of differences in minor and gynaecological emergency care supports the hypothesis that immigrants overcome certain barriers by using the emergency department to access to health services. The issue of healthcare barriers should therefore be addressed, especially among immigrants.


© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.