Table 2

Parameters considered in base case analysis and range for selected parameter estimates included in sensitivity analysis

Parameters

Base Case Estimate

Range


Proportion of population ≥ 40 years who participated in the screening program

73%

-

Percentage of tests in screenees who reported to be under treatment for diabetes prior to screening

5.4%

4.8 – 6.1a

Percentage of subjects in fasting state when screenedb

46.7%

30 – 50%c

Percentage of positive screening testsd

16.4%

-

Percentage of positive screenees who reported having diabetes diagnosis prior to the screening programe

16%

14 – 18.1%a

Percentage of positive screenees who returned for confirmatory testing

37.1%

0 – 100%c

Percentage of positive screenees who were diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus

10.1%

-

Percentage of positive screenees diagnosed with diabetes and incorporated into the healthcare system

9.4%

-

Additional local costs

0%

10 – 25%f

Estimated labor costs

US$ 5.99 million

US$ 4.65 – 8.98 million

Percentage of positive screenees who returned for confirmatory testing in the public system (as opposed to the private health sector)

100%

75 – 25%c


National Campaign to Detect Diabetes Mellitus. Brazil, 2001.

a Range corresponds to the 95% confidence interval of each estimate from the probabilistic sample.

b Fasting was defined as absence of food ingestion 4 hours prior to capillary glucose test.

c Range corresponds to an arbitrary estimate of the authors.

d Fasting glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/l or a casual glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/l.

e These subjects knew their previous diabetes diagnosis; however, they had not provided that information when asked about it during screening program.

f Range expressed as an additional percentage of national costs.

Toscano et al. BMC Health Services Research 2008 8:189   doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-189

Open Data