Table 5

Dimension 4: Crude and adjusted associations between patient characteristics and patients' evaluation of aspects of the organisation of care.



100% positive assessments 1
0–49% positive assessments 2





Prev.(%)
PR
Adj. PR
95% CI
Prev.(%)
PR
Adj. PR
95% CI

Gender
(N = 24154)
Female
64.5
1
13

23.4
1
1


Male
68.3
1.06
1.01
0.99 – 1.03
19.4
0.83
0.91
0.85 – 0.96

Age (years)
(N = 24154)
18–24
58.4
1
13

28.1
1
1


25–29
55.8
0.96
0.95
0.89 – 1.01
28.9
1.03
1.04
0.93 – 1.17

30–34
58.6
1.00
1.00
0.95 – 1.07
27.0
1.00
0.94
0.84 – 1.05

35–39
60.0
1.03
1.05
0.99 – 1.11
25.2
1.01
0.85
0.76 – 0.95

40–44
62.0
1.06
1.11
1.04 – 1.18
24.3
1.00
0.78
0.69 – 0.89

45–49
61.8
1.06
1.12
1.05 – 1.19
25.3
0.90
0.80
0.70 – 0.91

50–54
65.5
1.12
1.20
1.13 – 1.28
22.2
0.88
0.68
0.60 – 0.78

55–59
68.7
1.18
1.27
1.20 – 1.35
20.3
0.74
0.62
0.55 – 0.70

60–64
71.6
1.23
1.33
1.25 – 1.41
18.0
0.67
0.55
0.48 – 0.64

65–69
76.3
1.31
1.42
1.34 – 1.50
14.9
0.58
0.46
0.39 – 0.53

70–74
77.7
1.33
1.44
1.36 – 1.53
14.9
0.53
0.46
0.39 – 0.55

75–79
76.1
1.30
1.43
1.34 – 1.52
14.5
0.51
0.44
0.37 – 0.52

80+
76.5
1.31
1.44
1.36 – 1.54
16.3
0.57
0.48
0.41 – 0.57

Further education (years)
(N = 23058)
None
68.5
1
1

20.4
1
1


Less than 2
65.1
0.96
1.00
0.96 – 1.03
22.2
1.09
1.00
0.90 – 1.11

2–4
64.6
0.84
0.97
0.95 – 1.00
22.8
1.12
1.07
0.99 – 1.15

5 or more
64.8
0.79
0.98
0.95 – 1.01
23.0
1.13
1.11
1.00 – 1.22

Undergoing education or other
67.8
0.85
1.05
1.01 – 1.10
20.5
1.00
0.94
0.81 – 1.08

Frequency of attendance (times per year)
(N = 24154)
0–1
66.1
1
13

24.3
1
1


2–3
64.3
0.97
0.99
0.96 – 1.03
24.4
1.00
0.96
0.88 – 1.05

4–5
65.1
0.98
1.01
0.97 – 1.04
22.5
0.93
0.87
0.80 – 0.95

6–7
65.7
0.99
1.04
1.00 – 1.08
21.2
0.87
0.78
0.70 – 0.86

8–9
68.0
1.03
1.08
1.03 – 1.13
19.4
0.80
0.70
0.62 – 0.80

10+
68.2
1.03
1.12
1.08 – 1.17
18.7
0.77
0.63
0.57 – 0.69

Duration of listing (years)
(N = 16168)
Less than 1
65.6
1
13

25.8
1
1


1–2
64.8
0.99
0.97
0.92 – 1.02
23.8
0.92
0.97
0.86 – 1.10

3–7
65.6
1.00
0.96
0.92 – 1.01
21.9
0.85
0.92
0.82 – 1.04

8–12
68.1
1.04
0.98
0.93 – 1.03
20.2
0.78
0.89
0.78 – 1.01

13+
70.7
1.08
1.00
0.95 – 1.05
17.5
0.68
0.79
0.69 – 0.90

Self-rated health
(N = 24154)
Excellent
70.0
1
13

19.6
1
1


Very good
67.1
0.96
0.92
0.89 – 0.95
21.2
1.08
1.18
1.07 – 1.30

Good
66.3
0.95
0.82
0.79 – 0.84
21.8
1.11
1.51
1.37 – 1.65

Fair
61.1
0.87
0.71
0.69 – 0.74
25.3
1.29
2.02
1.82 – 2.24

Poor
60.8
0.87
0.70
0.65 – 0.74
25.1
1.28
2.11
1.82 – 2.44

Chronic condition
(N = 23810)
No
64.9
1
13

23.4
1
1


Yes-KRTC
71.2
1.10
1.03
1.01 – 1.06
17.9
0.77
0.88
0.81 – 0.96

Yes-other or multiple
63.8
0.98
1.00
0.98 – 1.03
22.7
0.97
0.93
0.88 – 1.00

Chronic condition
(N = 16049)
None
64.9
1
13

23.4
1
1


K – Cardiovascular
66.3
1.14
1.05
1.01 – 1.09
19.8
0.68
0.85
0.76 – 0.96

R – Respiratory
73.8
1.02
1.02
0.97 – 1.07
16.0
0.95
0.96
0.85 – 1.09

T – Endocrine
66.2
1.09
1.03
0.99 – 1.08
22.1
0.81
0.92
0.80 – 1.07

C – Cancer
70.5
1.16
1.12
1.04 – 1.21
18.8
0.56
0.62
0.46 – 0.84

Prevalence ratio (PR) for 100% positive assessments and for 0–49% positive assessments associated with different patient characteristics. Crude PRs are adjusted for clustering of patients. Adjusted PRs are adjusted for patients' gender, age, frequency of attending a GP, self-rated health and clustering of patients. Numbers in italics are used to indicate statistical significance.

1 Patients who marked 100% of the answered questions in one of the two most positive answering categories.

2 Patients who marked less than 50% (0–49%) of the answered questions in one of the two most positive answering categories.

3 Poisson regression with robust variance

Heje et al. BMC Health Services Research 2008 8:178   doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-178