Table 3

Dimension 2: Crude and adjusted associations between patient characteristics and patients' evaluation of aspects of the medical care.



100% positive assessments 1
0–49% positive assessments 2





Prev.(%)
PR
Adj. PR
95% CI
Prev.(%)
PR
Adj. PR
95% CI

Gender
(N = 25377)
Female
61.2
1
13

19.4
1
1


Male
61.2
1.00
0.95
0.93 – 0.97
19.2
0.99
1.06
1.00 – 1.13

Age (years)
(N = 25377)
18–24
47.8
1
13

26.2
1
1


25–29
52.3
1.09
1.07
0.99 – 1.16
23.2
1.03
0.92
0.82 – 1.04

30–34
56.8
1.19
1.18
1.10 – 1.26
21.6
1.00
0.84
0.75 – 0.93

35–39
56.3
1.18
1.20
1.13 – 1.29
21.8
1.01
0.79
0.71 – 0.88

40–44
57.7
1.21
1.29
1.19 – 1.38
20.9
1.00
0.71
0.63 – 0.79

45–49
57.5
1.20
1.31
1.22 – 1.41
21.9
0.90
0.70
0.62 – 0.78

50–54
61.1
1.28
1.44
1.33 – 1.55
19.0
0.88
0.57
0.50 – 0.65

55–59
64.5
1.35
1.55
1.43 – 1.66
17.9
0.74
0.52
0.46 – 0.60

60–64
67.1
1.40
1.61
1.50 – 1.73
15.6
0.67
0.45
0.40 – 0.52

65–69
73.0
1.53
1.76
1.64 – 1.88
13.1
0.58
0.38
0.33 – 0.45

70–74
71.4
1.49
1.73
1.61 – 1.86
14.9
0.53
0.43
0.38 – 0.50

75–79
70.1
1.47
1.73
1.61 – 1.85
14.8
0.51
0.42
0.36 – 0.48

80+
69.8
1.46
1.73
1.60 – 1.87
15.6
0.57
0.42
0.36 – 0.50

Further education (years)
(N = 24220)
None
60.2
1
13

19.6
1
1


Less than 2
60.4
1.01
1.03
0.99 – 1.07
20.8
1.06
1.04
0.94 – 1.16

2–4
61.5
0.91
1.02
0.99 – 1.05
19.1
0.97
1.02
0.95 – 1.10

5 or more
61.2
0.80
1.00
0.97 – 1.04
18.8
0.96
1.03
0.93 – 1.14

Undergoing education or other
61.4
0.90
1.07
1.02 – 1.12
17.3
0.88
0.85
0.74 – 0.97

Frequency of attendance (times per year)
(N = 25377)
0–1
64.2
1
13

19.0
1
1


2–3
60.9
0.95
0.98
0.95 – 1.01
19.2
1.01
0.96
0.88 – 1.05

4–5
61.9
0.96
1.01
0.98 – 1.05
19.3
1.02
0.92
0.84 – 1.01

6–7
60.0
0.94
1.01
0.98 – 1.06
19.3
1.02
0.85
0.77 – 0.94

8–9
60.6
0.94
1.04
1.00 – 1.09
19.5
1.03
0.82
0.73 – 0.92

10+
60.1
0.94
1.09
1.04 – 1.14
19.8
1.04
0.74
0.67 – 0.83

Duration of listing (years)
(N = 16880)
Less than 1
60.5
1
13

20.3
1
1


1–2
62.7
1.04
1.01
0.96 – 1.07
18.4
0.91
0.99
0.86 – 1.12

3–7
61.2
1.01
0.96
0.91 – 1.01
19.0
0.93
1.05
0.93 – 1.18

8–12
62.4
1.03
0.96
0.90 – 1.01
19.1
0.94
1.11
0.98 – 1.27

13+
65.8
1.09
1.00
0.94 – 1.06
16.0
0.79
0.94
0.83 – 1.08

Self-rated health
(N = 25377)
Excellent
71.8
1
13

13.4
1
1


Very good
64.8
0.90
0.86
0.83 – 0.89
15.7
1.17
1.27
1.14 – 1.43

Good
61.1
0.85
0.72
0.70 – 0.75
19.2
1.43
1.90
1.69 – 2.13

Fair
52.4
0.73
0.59
0.56 – 0.61
26.5
1.97
2.94
2.60 – 3.31

Poor
48.2
0.67
0.53
0.49 – 0.58
30.2
2.25
3.43
2.96 – 3.97

Chronic condition
(N = 25017)
No
64.6
1
13

18.6
1
1


Yes-KRTC
67.9
1.10
1.09
1.06 – 1.12
15.9
0.86
0.84
0.77 – 0.92

Yes-other or multiple
57.1
0.93
1.01
0.98 – 1.04
22.2
1.19
0.96
0.90 – 1.02

Chronic condition
(N = 17058)

61.6
1
13

18.6
1
1


K – Cardiovascular
70.6
1.15
1.12
1.08 – 1.16
13.7
0.73
0.76
0.67 – 0.87

R – Respiratory
60.6
0.98
1.05
0.99 – 1.10
19.4
1.04
0.90
0.79 – 1.04

T – Endocrine
68.2
1.11
1.11
1.06 – 1.16
17.9
0.96
0.94
0.81 – 1.08

C – Cancer
75.2
1.22
1.28
1.19 – 1.37
11.7
0.63
0.55
0.39 – 0.77

Prevalence ratio (PR) for 100% positive assessments and for 0–49% positive assessments associated with different patient characteristics. Crude PRs are adjusted for clustering of patients. Adjusted PRs are adjusted for patients' gender, age, frequency of attending a GP, self -rated health and clustering of frequency patients. Numbers in italics are used to indicate statistical significance.

1 Patients who marked 100% of the answered questions in one of the two most positive answering categories.

2 Patients who marked less than 50% (0–49%) of the answered questions in one of the two most positive answering categories.

3 Poisson regression with robust variance

Heje et al. BMC Health Services Research 2008 8:178   doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-178