BMC Health Services Research Volume 8
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Research articleGonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist use in men without a cancer registry diagnosis of prostate cancerYong-fang Kuo1,2,3 , James S Goodwin1,2,3 and Vahakn B Shahinian4  1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA 2Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA 3Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA 4Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA author email corresponding author email
BMC Health Services Research 2008,
8:146doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-146 Abstract
Background
Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists has become popular for virtually all stages of prostate cancer. We hypothesized that some men receive these agents after only a limited work-up for their cancer. Such cases may be missed by tumor registries, leading to underestimates of the total extent of GnRH agonist use.
Methods
We used linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 1993 through 2001 to identify GnRH agonist use in men with either a diagnosis of prostate cancer registered in SEER, or with a diagnosis of prostate cancer based only on Medicare claims (from the 5% control sample of Medicare beneficiaries residing in SEER areas without a registered diagnosis of cancer). The proportion of incident GnRH agonist users without a registry diagnosis of prostate cancer was calculated. Factors associated with lack of a registry diagnosis were examined in multivariable analyses.
Results
Of incident GnRH agonist users, 8.9% had no diagnosis of prostate cancer registered in SEER. In a multivariable logistic regression model, lack of a registry diagnosis of prostate cancer in GnRH agonist users was significantly more likely with increasing comorbidity, whereas it was less likely in men who had undergone either inpatient admission or procedures such as radical prostatectomy, prostate biopsy, or transurethral resection of the prostate.
Conclusion
Reliance solely on tumor registry data may underestimate the rate of GnRH agonist use in men with prostate cancer. |