BMC Health Services Research Volume 8
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 CorrespondenceThe value of healthWim Groot1 and Henriëtte Maassen van den Brink2  1Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Maastricht University Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Postoffice Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands 2"Scholar" Research Center for Education and Labor Market, University of Amsterdam Department of General Economics, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands author email corresponding author email
BMC Health Services Research 2008,
8:136doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-136 Abstract
Background
A major problem in cost-effectiveness studies is where to draw the line between interventions which are cost-effective and those who are not. Lacking a notion about the value of a QALY, all ultimate values to the cost-effectiveness ratio are essentially arbitrary.
Methods
This paper presents a simple empirical model to estimate the compensating income variation of diseases and health problems. The model is estimated using data for the Netherlands.
Results
The compensating income variation is between €20,000 and €90,000. This is higher than most of the ultimate values used by policy-makers to decide whether an intervention is cost-effective. Our figures are roughly similar to those found in studies about the value of a statistical life year.
Conclusion
Estimates on the compensating income variation of diseases and health problems may provide useful information on the maximum acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio of medical interventions than those currently used by policy makers. |