Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Health Services Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Physicians' views on resource availability and equity in four European health care systems

Samia A Hurst1, Reidun Forde2, Stella Reiter-Theil3, Anne-Marie Slowther4, Arnaud Perrier5, Renzo Pegoraro6 and Marion Danis7*

Author Affiliations

1 Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Geneva University Medical School, Switzerland

2 The Research Institute, Norwegian Medical Association and University of Oslo, Norway

3 Institute for Applied Ethics and Medical Ethics, University of Basel, Switzerland

4 The Ethox Centre, Oxford University, Headington, UK

5 General Internal Medicine Service, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

6 Fondazione Lanza, Padova, Italy

7 National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2007, 7:137  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-137

Published: 31 August 2007

Abstract

Background

In response to limited resources, health care systems have adopted diverse cost-containment strategies and give priority to differing types of interventions. The perception of physicians, who witness the effects of these strategies, may provide useful insights regarding the impact of system-wide priority setting on access to care.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey to ascertain generalist physicians' perspectives on resources allocation and its consequences in Norway, Switzerland, Italy and the UK.

Results

Survey respondents (N = 656, response rate 43%) ranged in age from 28–82, and averaged 25 years in practice. Most respondents (87.7%) perceived some resources as scarce, with the most restrictive being: access to nursing home, mental health services, referral to a specialist, and rehabilitation for stroke. Respondents attributed adverse outcomes to scarcity, and some respondents had encountered severe adverse events such as death or permanent disability. Despite universal coverage, 45.6% of respondents reported instances of underinsurance. Most respondents (78.7%) also reported some patient groups as more likely than others to be denied beneficial care on the basis of cost. Almost all respondents (97.3%) found at least one cost-containment policy acceptable. The types of policies preferred suggest that respondents are willing to participate in cost-containment, and do not want to be guided by administrative rules (11.2%) or restrictions on hospital beds (10.7%).

Conclusion

Physician reports can provide an indication of how organizational factors may affect availability and equity of health care services. Physicians are willing to participate in cost-containment decisions, rather than be guided by administrative rules. Tools should be developed to enable physicians, who are in a unique position to observe unequal access or discrimination in their health care environment, to address these issues in a more targeted way.