Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Oct 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
1 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Mackay |
9 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally McClean |
14 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Michel Nguyen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
22 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Arul Earnest |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Mackay |
21 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Michel Nguyen |
24 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Arul Earnest |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
8 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Arul Earnest |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
8 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
11 May 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
11 May 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-5-36 |
You can find further information about peer review here.