Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group1Center for Practice and Technology Assessment, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Rd. Rokville, MD 20852, USA 2Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK 3Informed Choice Research Department, Norwegian Health Services Research Centre, Pb. 7004 St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway 4Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada 5Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Level 5, New Med 2 Building, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia 6Department of Oncology and Hematology, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico, Via dal Pozzo 41, 41100 Modena, Italia and Centro per la Valutazione della Efficacia della Assistenza Sanitaria (CeVEAS), Modena, Italy 7Cancer Epidemiology Research Unit, Cancer Research and Registers Division, The Cancer Council NSW, PO Box 572, Kings Cross NSW 1340, Australia 8Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK 9Departments of Medicine and Social & Preventive Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, ECMC-CC142, 462 Grinder St, Buffalo, NY 14215, USA 10Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy, World Health Organisation, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland 11The Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, HSR&D, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University Medical Center, 508 Fulton St., Durham, NC 27705, USA
BMC Health Services Research 2004, 4:38doi:10.1186/1472-6963-4-38
Additional filesAdditional File 1: American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), a brief description of the ACCP approach. Format: DOC Size: 49KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer Additional File 2: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (ANHMRC), a brief description of the ANHMRC approach. Format: DOC Size: 38KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer Additional File 3: Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (OCEBM), a brief description of the OCEBM approach. Format: DOC Size: 73KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer Additional File 4: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines (SIGN), a brief description of the SIGN approach. Format: DOC Size: 27KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer Additional File 5: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), a brief description of the USPSTF approach. Format: DOC Size: 51KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer Additional File 6: U.S. Task Force on Community Preventive Services (USTFCPS), a brief description of the USTFCPS approach. Format: DOC Size: 82KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer |



on Google Scholar







author email
corresponding author email