Open Access Research article

Navigating veterans with an abnormal prostate cancer screening test: a quasi-experimental study

Melissa A Simon12*, Narissa J Nonzee123, June M McKoy12, Dachao Liu123, Thanh Ha Luu4, Peter Byer13, Elizabeth A Eklund123, Elizabeth A Richey5, Zhigang Wu36, XinQi Dong4 and Alfred W Rademaker12

Author Affiliations

1 Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

2 Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

3 Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

4 Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

5 Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA

6 University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2013, 13:314  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-314

Published: 15 August 2013

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer disproportionately affects low-income and minority men. This study evaluates the impact of a patient navigation intervention on timeliness of diagnostic resolution and treatment initiation among veterans with an abnormal prostate cancer screen.

Methods

Participants were enrolled between 2006 and 2010. The intervention involved a social worker and lay health worker navigation team that assisted patients in overcoming barriers to care. For navigated (n = 245) versus control (n = 245) participants, we evaluated rates of diagnostic resolution and treatment and adjusted for race, age, and Gleason score.

Results

Of 490 participants, 68% were African American, 47% were ≥ 65 years old, and 35% had cancer. Among those with an abnormal screen, navigation did not have a significant effect on time to diagnostic resolution compared to controls (median days of 97 versus 111; adj. HR 1.17, 95% CI, 0.96-1.43, p = 0.12). On analysis of the period beyond 80 days, navigated men reached resolution faster than controls (median of 151 days versus 190 days; adj. HR 1.41, 95% CI, 1.07-1.86, p = 0.01). Among those with cancer, navigation did not have a significant effect on time to treatment initiation compared to controls (median of 93 days versus 87 days; adj. HR 1.15, 95% CI, 0.82-1.62, p = 0.41).

Conclusion

Our navigation program did not significantly impact the overall time to resolution or treatment for men with prostate cancer compared to controls. The utility of navigation programs may extend beyond targeted navigation times, however, and future studies focusing on other outcomes measures are therefore needed.