Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Health Services Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Definition of a core set of quality indicators for the assessment of HIV/AIDS clinical care: a systematic review

Emanuel Catumbela123*, Victor Certal13, Alberto Freitas13, Carlos Costa4, António Sarmento5 and Altamiro da Costa Pereira13

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Health Information and Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al. Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal

2 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Agostinho Neto, Luanda, Angola

3 CINTESIS - Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

4 National School of Public Health, University Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

5 Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2013, 13:236  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-236

Published: 28 June 2013

Abstract

Background

Several organizations and individual authors have been proposing quality indicators for the assessment of clinical care in HIV/AIDS patients. Nevertheless, the definition of a consensual core set of indicators remains controversial and its practical use is largely limited. This study aims not only to identify and characterize these indicators through a systematic literature review but also to propose a parsimonious model based on those most used.

Methods

MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane databases and ISI Web of Knowledge, as well as official websites of organizations dealing with HIV/AIDS care, were searched for articles and information proposing HIV/AIDS clinical care quality indicators. The ones that are on patient’s perspective and based on services set were excluded. Data extraction, using a predefined data sheet based on Cochrane recommendations, was done by one of the authors while a second author rechecked the extracted data for any inconsistency.

Results

A total of 360 articles were identified in our search query but only 12 of them met the inclusion criteria. We also identified one relevant site. Overall, we identified 65 quality indicators for HIV/AIDS clinical care distributed as following: outcome (n=15) and process-related (n=50) indicators; generic (n=36) and HIV/AIDS disease-specific (n=29) indicators; baseline examinations (n=19), screening (n=9), immunization (n=4), prophylaxis (n=5), HIV monitoring (n=16), and therapy (=12) indicators.

Conclusions

There are several studies that set up HIV clinical care indicators, with only a part of them useful to assess the HIV clinical care. More importantly, HIV/AIDS clinical care indicators need to be valid, reliable and most of all feasible.

Keywords:
Performance Measures; Quality Indicator; Infectious Disease