Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Health Services Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Why do health workers in rural Tanzania prefer public sector employment?

Nils Gunnar Songstad1*, Karen Marie Moland12, Deodatus Amadeus Massay3 and Astrid Blystad14

Author Affiliations

1 Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7804, 5020 Bergen, Norway

2 Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bergen University College, P.O. Box 7030, 5020 Bergen, Norway

3 Community Social and Economic Empowerment (COSEE), P.O. Box 137, Mbulu Manyara, Tanzania

4 Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7804, 5020 Bergen, Norway

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2012, 12:92  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-92

Published: 5 April 2012

Abstract

Background

Severe shortages of qualified health workers and geographical imbalances in the workforce in many low-income countries require the national health sector management to closely monitor and address issues related to the distribution of health workers across various types of health facilities. This article discusses health workers' preferences for workplace and their perceptions and experiences of the differences in working conditions in the public health sector versus the church-run health facilities in Tanzania. The broader aim is to generate knowledge that can add to debates on health sector management in low-income contexts.

Methods

The study has a qualitative study design to elicit in-depth information on health workers' preferences for workplace. The data comprise ten focus group discussions (FGDs) and 29 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with auxiliary staff, nursing staff, clinicians and administrators in the public health sector and in a large church-run hospital in a rural district in Tanzania. The study has an ethnographic backdrop based on earlier long-term fieldwork in Tanzania.

Results

The study found a clear preference for public sector employment. This was associated with health worker rights and access to various benefits offered to health workers in government service, particularly the favourable pension schemes providing economic security in old age. Health workers acknowledged that church-run hospitals generally were better equipped and provided better quality patient care, but these concerns tended to be outweighed by the financial assets of public sector employment. In addition to the sector specific differences, family concerns emerged as important in decisions on workplace.

Conclusions

The preference for public sector employment among health workers shown in this study seems to be associated primarily with the favourable pension scheme. The overall shortage of health workers and the distribution between health facilities is a challenge in a resource constrained health system where church-run health facilities are vital in the provision of health care in rural areas and where patients tend to prefer these services. In order to ensure equity in distribution of qualified health workers in Tanzania, a national regulation and legislation of the pension schemes is required.

Keywords:
Pension benefits; Working conditions; Human resources; Rural health services; Tanzania