Table 8 |
|||||||
| ZAP – Confirmatory factor analysis - Model fit in younger and older children | |||||||
| Model | Chi2 | Df | p-value | CFI | RMSEA | SRMR | |
| "Child"-Scales | |||||||
| Model 0 | Unconstrained basic model | 424 | 148 | <0.000 | 0.96 | 0.62 | 0.040 |
| Model 1 | Constrained regression weights, covariances, and error terms | 508 | 176 | <0.000 | 0.95 | 0.063 | 0.050 |
| Model 1 vs. Model 0 | 84 | 28 | <0.000 | ||||
| Model 2 | Constrained regression weights and covariances | 447 | 162 | <0.000 | 0.96 | 0.063 | 0.040 |
| Model 2 vs. Model 0 | 23 | 14 | 0.06 | ||||
| Model 3 | Constrained regression weights | 434 | 159 | <0.000 | 0.96 | 0.063 | 0.040 |
| Model 3 vs. Model 0 | 10 | 11 | 0.53 | ||||
| "Parent“-Scales | |||||||
| Model 0 | Unconstrained basic model | 692 | 282 | <0.000 | 0.95 | 0.049 | 0.049 |
| Model 1 | Constrained regression weights, covariances, and error terms | 820 | 326 | <0.000 | 0.94 | 0.05 | 0.064 |
| Model 1 vs. Model 0 | 128 | 44 | <0.000 | ||||
| Model 2 | Constrained regression weights and covariances | 763 | 306 | <0.000 | 0.94 | 0.049 | 0.06 |
| Model 2 vs. Model 0 | 71 | 24 | |||||
| Model 3 | Constrained regression weights | 720 | 296 | <0.000 | 0.95 | 0.048 | 0.051 |
| Model 3 vs. Model 0 | 28 | 14 | 0.014 | ||||
Legend:
Chi2 = Chi-Square-Statistic Df = Degrees of freedom CFI = Comparative Fit Index.
RMSEA = Root-Mean-Square-Error of Approximation SRMS = Standardized-Root-Mean.
Square-Residual.
Bitzer et al. BMC Health Services Research 2012 12:347 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-347