BMC Health Services Research

official impact factor 1.72

This article is part of the supplement: Social audit: building the community voice into health service delivery and planning

Open Access Research article

Clustering and meso-level variables in cross-sectional surveys: an example of food aid during the Bosnian crisis

Neil Andersson1* and Gilles Lamothe2

Author Affiliations

1 Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Calle Pino, El Roble, Acapulco, México

2 Department of Mathematics, University of Ottawa, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2011, 11(Suppl 2):S15 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-S2-S15

Published: 21 December 2011

Abstract

Background

Focus groups, rapid assessment procedures, key informant interviews and institutional reviews of local health services provide valuable insights on health service resources and performance. A long-standing challenge of health planning is to combine this sort of qualitative evidence in a unified analysis with quantitative evidence from household surveys. A particular challenge in this regard is to take account of the neighbourhood or clustering effects, recognising that these can be informative or incidental.

Methods

An example of food aid and food sufficiency from the Bosnian emergency (1995-96) illustrates two Lamothe cluster-adjustments of the Mantel Haenszel (MH) procedure, one assuming a fixed odds ratio and the other allowing for informative clustering by not assuming a fixed odds ratio. We compared these with conventional generalised estimating equations and a generalised linear mixed (GLMM) model, using a Laplace adjustment.

Results

The MH adjustment assuming incidental clustering generated a final model very similar to GEE. The adjustment that does not assume a fixed odds ratio produced a final multivariate model and effect sizes very similar to GLMM.

Discussion

In medium or large data sets with stratified last stage random sampling, the cluster adjusted MH is substantially more conservative than the naïve MH computation. In the example of food aid in the Bosnian crisis, the cluster adjusted MH that does not assume a fixed odds ratio produced similar results to the GLMM, which identified informative clustering.