Table 3 |
||
|
Views of health service users in the two districts about the quality of the service they received from government and private facilities |
||
|
Views of service users |
Proportion (weighted %) of service users |
|
|
SM district |
NGO district |
|
|
|
||
|
Government service users |
||
|
Reception from health worker good or very good |
671/836 (80) |
968/1258 (76) |
|
Quality of care better than expected |
312/837 (37) |
604/1257 (48) |
|
Satisfied with overall care |
563/841 (67) |
845/1258 (67) |
|
Private service users |
||
|
Reception from health worker good or very good |
557/581 (96) |
92/99 (93) |
|
Quality of care better than expected |
396/580 (68) |
36/100 (35) |
|
Satisfied with overall care |
487/583 (84) |
46/99 (47) |
|
|
||
|
In SM district government health services were provided mainly by contracting the Provincial Health Office under the Strengthening Mechanism; in NGO district the services were provided mainly by a contracted NGO. |
||
|
Cockcroft et al. BMC Health Services Research 2011 11(Suppl 2):S11 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-S2-S11 |
||