Long term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of services for urinary symptoms
1 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK
2 Mid Yorkshire Hospitals, Aberford Road,Wakefield,WF1 4DG, UK
3 Wessex Institute University of Southampton,Alpha House, Enterprise Rd,Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
4 University of Glamorgan, UK. Glyntaff Campus,Pontypridd,CF37 1DL, UK
BMC Health Services Research 2011, 11:58 doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-58Published: 14 March 2011
Given the extent and priority of urinary symptoms there is little evidence available to inform service provision in relation to the long term effects of interventions. This study aims to determine the long term (6 year) clinical effectiveness and costs of a new continence nurse led service compared to standard care for urinary symptoms.
A long term follow-up study of a 2-arm, non-blinded randomised controlled trial that recruited from a community based population between 1998-2000 in Leicestershire and Rutland UK was undertaken. 3746 men and women aged 40 years and over were followed up from the original trial. The continence nurse practitioner (CNP) intervention comprised a continence service provided by specially trained nurses delivering evidence-based interventions using pre-determined care pathways. The standard care (SC) arm comprised access to existing primary care including General Practitioner and continence advisory services in the area. Primary outcome: Improvement in one or more symptom. Secondary outcomes included: a) Leicester Impact scale; b) patient perception of problem; c) number of symptoms alleviated and cost-effectiveness; all were recorded at long term follow-up (average 6 years) post-randomisation.
Overall at long-term follow-up (average 6 years) significantly more individuals in the CNP group (72%) had improved (i.e had fewer symptoms) compared to those in the SC group (67%) (difference of 5% 95% (CI = 0.6 to 9;p = 0.02)).
The differences in outcome between the two randomised groups shown immediately post treatment had decreased by half in terms of symptom improvement at long term follow-up. Although the difference was statistically significant, the clinical significance may not be, although the direction of the difference favoured the new CNP service.