Open Access Research article

Structural factors and best practices in implementing a linkage to HIV care program using the ARTAS model

Jason Craw12*, Lytt Gardner2*, Amber Rossman3, DeAnn Gruber4, O'Donnell Noreen5, Diana Jordan6, Richard Rapp7, Cathy Simpson8 and Karen Phillips9

Author Affiliations

1 Northrop Grumman Corporation, Atlanta, GA, USA

2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

3 Kansas City Free Health Clinic, Community Services Department, Kansas City, MO, USA

4 Louisiana Office of Public Health, HIV/AIDS Program, New Orleans, LA, USA

5 South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, SC, USA

6 Virginia Department of Health, Division of Disease Prevention, HIV Care Services, Richmond, VA, USA

7 Center for Interventions, Treatment and Addictions Research, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA

8 University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, Birmingham, AL, USA

9 Health Services Center, Inc., Anniston, AL, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2010, 10:246  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-246

Published: 20 August 2010

Abstract

Background

Implementation of linkage to HIV care programs in the U.S. is poorly described in the literature despite the central role of these programs in delivering clients from HIV testing facilities to clinical care sites. Models demonstrating success in linking clients to HIV care from testing locations that do not have co-located medical care are especially needed.

Methods

Data from the Antiretroviral Treatment Access Studies-II project ('ARTAS-II') as well as site visit and project director reports were used to describe structural factors and best practices found in successful linkage to care programs. Successful programs were able to identify recently diagnosed HIV-positive persons and ensure that a high percentage of persons attended an initial HIV primary care provider visit within six months of enrolling in the linkage program.

Results

Eight categories of best practices are described, supplemented by examples from 5 of 10 ARTAS-II sites. These five sites highlighted in the best practices enrolled a total of 352 HIV+ clients and averaged 85% linked to care after six months. The other five grantees enrolled 274 clients and averaged 72% linked to care after six months. Sites with co-located HIV primary medical care services had higher linkage to care rates than non-co-located sites (87% vs. 73%). Five grantees continued linkage to care activities in some capacity after project funding ended.

Conclusions

With the push to expand HIV testing in all U.S. communities, implementation and evaluation of linkage to care programs is needed to maximize the benefits of expanded HIV testing efforts