Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Health Services Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Staff attitudes and the associations with treatment organisation, clinical practices and outcomes in opioid maintenance treatment

Linn Gjersing1*, Helge Waal1, John RM Caplehorn2, Michael Gossop13 and Thomas Clausen1

Author Affiliations

1 SERAF- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, (Kirkeveien 166), Oslo, (0407), Norway

2 Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, (Edward Ford Building A27), NSW, (2006), Australia

3 Kings College London, National Addiction Centre/Institute of Psychiatry, (4 Windsor Walk), London (SE5 8AF), UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2010, 10:194  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-194

Published: 6 July 2010

Abstract

Background

In opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) there are documented treatment differences both between countries and between OMT programmes. Some of these differences have been associated with staff attitudes. The aim of this study was to 1) assess if there were differences in staff attitudes within a national OMT programme, and 2) investigate the associations of staff attitudes with treatment organisation, clinical practices and outcomes.

Methods

This study was a cross-sectional multicentre study. Norwegian OMT staff (n = 140) were invited to participate in this study in 2007 using an instrument measuring attitudes towards OMT. The OMT programme comprised 14 regional centres. Data describing treatment organisation, clinical practices and patient outcomes in these centres were extracted from the annual OMT programme assessment 2007. Centres were divided into three groups based upon mean attitudinal scores and labelled; "rehabilitation-oriented", "harm reduction-oriented" and "intermediate" centres.

Results

All invited staff (n = 140) participated. Staff attitudes differed between the centres. "Rehabilitation-oriented" centres had smaller caseloads, more frequent urine drug screening and increased case management (interdisciplinary meetings). In addition these centres had less drug use and more social rehabilitation among their patients in terms of long-term living arrangements, unemployment, and social security benefits as main income. "Intermediate" centres had the lowest treatment termination rate.

Conclusions

This study identified marked variations in staff attitudes between the regional centres within a national OMT programme. These variations were associated with measurable differences in caseload, intensity of case management and patient outcomes.