Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Cost minimization analysis of different growth hormone pen devices based on time-and-motion simulations

Original Submission
25 Feb 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Geralyn Spollett
18 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Spetz
21 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Nancy Nickman
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Spetz
3 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Geralyn Spollett
4 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Nancy Nickman
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Nancy Nickman
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
31 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Nancy Nickman
Resubmission - Version 8
31 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
8 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
8 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6955-9-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page