Table 4 |
|||||
|
Effect of phone calls and supervision visits on data quality, stratified by type of site |
|||||
|
Error per Total Reports* (EPTR) |
Variation EPTR |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Type Site |
Group |
Pre Intervention % |
Intervention % |
Δ(CI) |
p-value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinic |
Phone |
0.99 |
1.06 |
↑0.07 (↓0.9 – ↑1.0) |
0.888 |
|
Visits |
7.10 |
2.00 |
↓5.10 (↓8.7 - ↓1.4) |
0.007 |
|
|
Control |
1.94 |
1.02 |
↓0.92 (↓3.4 - ↑1.5) |
0.470 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Ship |
Phone |
8.16 |
6.69 |
↓1.47 (↓4.6 - ↑1.7) |
0.361 |
|
Visits |
7.32 |
6.67 |
↓0.65 (↓2.4 - ↑1.1) |
0.455 |
|
|
Control |
8.49 |
7.59 |
↓0.90 (↓3.6 - ↑1.8) |
0.519 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
(*) Error per total reports (EPTR) = Number of errors detected in reports divided by the total number of reports, multiplied by 100 |
|||||
|
Huaman et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2009 9:16 doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-16 |
|||||
